Investors must hold bad bosses to account

Institutional shareholders need to be as agile and active as private equity in dealing with failures of leadership.

3 minute read

gavel on a block

After the recent surge in bid activity, culminating in a premium offer for Peppa Pig owner Entertainment One from the American toys giant Hasbro, investors must ask themselves why so many companies are being bid for now, what this signals and how they should respond in terms of corporate governance and portfolio positioning.

Most of the recent bids have come from private equity (PE) players, which are focused on the longer-term resale value of the companies they buy. Companies are only attractive to PE when there has been mismanagement of their strategy, operations or balance sheet, or the market does not appreciate their long-term value prospects. Both these issues are failings of company leadership.

The way forward is not to focus on tired solutions to public market short-termism and PE financial engineering, but for institutional shareholders to step up. Specifically, they must hold company leadership to account for poor performance, and push for more decisive and swift action in replacing chief executives, finance directors and chairmen when they fail to deliver. It can be argued that PE firms are good for public markets in the same way that activist investors help to create management and price discipline.

However, institutional investors cannot rely on them to facilitate change. We have to be active ourselves.

If a bid materialises, particularly from PE, the board and shareholders must be fighters, not quitters. Boards should look first to resolve internally the valuation issues that have been highlighted by the bid, engaging with their long-term shareholders as part of the process.

There have been many high-profile examples of bids that were rebuffed, with the target companies going on to flourish — including Unilever and Astra Zeneca. If this is not possible because of a lack of shareholder support and the board decides to sell, they must strive to achieve the best price. Shareholders should also look to the long-term value of the business and ensure that boards of target companies follow this process.

Sadly, this behaviour has not been apparent in recent months, with companies selling out too cheaply — either because of boards being driven by the personal agendas of executive managements who have tired of public markets, a general tendency for boards to raise the white flag too early, or shareholders being too happy to sell out too soon.

The air-to-air refuelling specialist Cobham only started to recover after new leadership was installed in 2016. It is now being bought out before the market can benefit from the stronger foundations put in place.

At Merlin Entertainments, the leadership team had ample opportunity to impress the market after floating in 2013, but failed to hit earnings objectives consistently before blaming investors for undervaluing the company and selling out quietly to private equity.

At RPC, the packaging company, the board failed to adapt after investors no longer favoured an acquisition-led strategy and in effect gave up the option of being an independently quoted company. After a protracted PE bid process, they sold out below the shares’ 2016/17 highs.

Meanwhile, brewer Greene King’s difficulties in dealing with business headwinds and communicating a convincing growth strategy led to a material undervaluation of the asset base by investors, allowing a bid to come in at 50% higher than the market price. It was immediately accepted by management.

Underperforming management and shareholder diffidence isn’t the only driver of the increase in bid activity. While Brexit fears explain why domestically focused listed businesses have been valued at a significant discount to global peers since the referendum, recent bids suggest some international and PE acquirers have decided the impact of no-deal is now fully discounted, both in terms of economic and currency risk. If they are right, we are likely to see more bids — unless the UK market starts to value domestic assets more highly and boards defend themselves more robustly.

The evidence of recent bids shows a lot still has to be done to avoid British companies being sold too cheaply. Management and shareholder behaviour has to change to limit the risk of a bid, and boards must respond effectively to maximise shareholder value if one emerges. Investors and boards must be more proactive in instigating management change where necessary, and be aware that these bids may be signalling excessive negativity around UK-based companies.

Momentum has been against UK stocks for some time. These bids signal it may be time for investors to pivot toward the UK equity market. During times of change, investors would do well to remember that only dead fish swim with the stream. Active investors should change direction and look more favourably on the outlook for the UK, deal or no deal.

This article originally appeared in The Sunday Times.


Important information

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). As at June 2019 Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

In the UK & Europe this material has been prepared and issued by AIGSL, registered in England No.1151805. Registered Office: St. Helen’s, 1 Undershaft, London, EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority. In France, Aviva Investors France is a portfolio management company approved by the French Authority “Autorité des Marchés Financiers”, under n° GP 97-114, a limited liability company with Board of Directors and Supervisory Board, having a share capital of 17 793 700 euros, whose registered office is located at 14 rue Roquépine, 75008 Paris and registered in the Paris Company Register under n° 335 133 229. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH, authorised by FINMA as a distributor of collective investment schemes.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material.  AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 30, Collins Place, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) and commodity pool operator (“CPO”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”).  AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606

Related views