Pricing power is the magic ingredient for equity investors

Evidence that a company wields pricing power in its industry is the best indication of a sustainable competitive advantage, argues Giles Parkinson.

Pricing power is the magic ingredient for equity investors

“Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts,” wrote the sociologist William Bruce Cameron.1 This maxim is worth pondering as the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic prompts many of us to reconsider how we spend our money.

During challenging times, we seek to quantify value. In some rare cases, we may find ourselves willing to pay more for a company’s product or service than we currently do. The cost of some luxury fashion items has risen during the pandemic, while studies show that when stranded at home under lockdown, subscribers would pay more for technology platforms such as Spotify than the current fee, despite the availability of cheaper alternatives.2

Pricing power is the best indicator of a long-term competitive advantage. But it is not always easy to spot

“If you’ve got the power to raise prices without losing business to a competitor, you’ve got a very good business,” as Berkshire Hathaway chairman and CEO Warren Buffett once put it. “And if you need a prayer session before raising the price by a tenth of a cent, you’ve got a terrible business.”3

Buffett is right: pricing power is the best indicator investors have of a long-term competitive advantage. But it is not always easy to spot.

Pricing power and valuation

In assessing whether a company is likely to prove successful over the long term, investors need to consider many factors, such as the quality of its management and potential for growth.

Some investors also rely on measures such as high returns on invested capital. While this is a useful metric, it can be distorted: returns can be inflated by temporary cyclical conditions, for example. And many companies now tend to focus their capital outlays on intangible assets such as software and design, making it more difficult to quantify returns on investment than was the case when companies invested mostly in physical assets and equipment.

Pricing power comes into its own as a practical and reliable index of a company’s competitive advantage

In this context, pricing power comes into its own as a practical and reliable index of a company’s competitive advantage. In microeconomics, the concept is broken into two categories: nominal pricing power and real pricing power. Nominal pricing power refers to a company’s ability to raise prices in line with inflation, allowing it to cover input costs and preserve profits. This is useful, but real pricing power is more interesting from an investment perspective, as it refers to a company’s ability to raise prices above inflation. Many investors view nominal and real pricing power as synonymous, but there is a subcategory of firms with real pricing power that can consistently and sustainably raise prices faster than the rate of inflation.

This has significant implications for equity valuations, which are usually calculated on the basis of discounted cashflow (DCF). The DCF model assumes that after the explicit forecast period, a company will continue to generate cashflows at a constant rate in perpetuity; this is known as terminal value. As inflation is a factor in calculating terminal value, the figure should be higher for a company with real pricing power; this, in turn, is likely to imply a higher valuation for the business today.

Examples of pricing power

So, what does pricing power look like in the real world? The first thing to say is that pricing power can exist on a sector or company level. Sometimes it emerges as a consequence of the specific dynamics of a particular industry.

Take spirits, a product where pricing power is partly a quirk of tax policy. Because alcohol is highly taxed, the manufacturer’s share takes up a smaller component of the retail price of a bottle than is the case for other products. This means marginal price rises can yield a proportionally higher increase in profits for the manufacturer.

The difference between the price charged and the value created gives the rating agencies considerable pricing power

Or consider credit ratings. In many cases, bonds must have a minimum credit rating from two of the three main ratings firms to satisfy the requirements of regulators and investment mandates. If a bond has such a rating, the issuer can therefore sell the debt with a much lower interest cost than would be the case for an unrated bond, because there are more buyers for it. But what the rating agencies charge is only a fraction of the overall “value”. The difference between the price charged and the value created gives the rating agencies considerable pricing power.

Elsewhere, pricing power reflects the more indefinable characteristics of a product or brand. The price of luxury handbags, for example, has historically risen far in excess of inflation. According to research from Boston Consulting Group, which tracked the median price of a luxury handbag across seven brands between 2002 and 2012, prices increased at an annual rate of 14 per cent in the US, significantly outpacing the average inflation growth rate of 2.5 per cent over the period.4 Brands such as Louis Vuitton and Hermès have hiked prices in 2020.5

Another good example is the price of Disney theme park tickets. Figure 1 shows the price of a single ticket to Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida, from its opening in 1971 to 2019, compared with the original price ($3.50) as adjusted for the year-on-year rate of inflation. If the price had simply risen in line with inflation, the current cost of a ticket would be around $22; the actual cost in 2019 was $125. This is evidence of pricing power that has persisted for almost half a century.

Figure 1: Price of a single ticket to Disney World
rice of a single ticket to Disney World
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, GoBankingRates, 2020

What counts?

Companies that can raise prices consistently while retaining customers have a formidable competitive advantage. In an equity portfolio, such firms can help drive resilient returns over the long term. The challenge is how to identify them ahead of the wider market.

Consumer surveys can give investors a sense of a company’s pricing power before it raises prices

Consumer surveys can give investors a sense of a company’s pricing power before it raises prices. Take Netflix. A survey of 2,500 US consumers in May 2020 showed 55 per cent would be willing to pay more for Netflix than they currently do, up from 47 per cent in December 2019.6 This reflects how the company’s pricing power has increased in the current circumstances (though it has yet to raise the subscription fee).

Usage data can also provide an indication of tech companies’ pricing power. For example, Comscore data shows Google Maps has more users on iPhones than Apple Maps, even though the Google app is no longer pre-installed on the device. Moreover, those who prefer Google Maps spend almost ten times longer using the app, on average, than Apple Maps users. Similarly, Google-owned YouTube is now downloaded on 90 per cent of iPhones, despite not being pre-installed.7 This suggests users consider Google products to be superior, giving it scope to further monetise its platforms and potentially providing some insulation against regulatory risk – an important consideration in light of the ongoing Department of Justice antitrust lawsuit against parent company Alphabet.

Consumer surveys do not always provide a full picture of the factors behind pricing power, however. Take luxury handbags, where ownership is associated with such intangibles as self-worth; in this case, the desirability of the item also increases along with the price. As for Disney, one reason it has been able to raise the price of its theme park tickets over time is that a trip to the Magic Kingdom has a deeply ingrained cachet for American families. In this case, pricing power is based on a mixture of brand loyalty and cultural prestige over five decades.

Investors need to make judgements based on qualitative factors, as well as surveying the company’s revenue history and current consumer sentiment

In gauging the sustainability of a company’s pricing power, investors will need to make judgements based on these kinds of qualitative factors, as well as surveying the company’s revenue history and current consumer sentiment.

Unlike quantitative metrics, which tend to get dropped into a Bloomberg spreadsheet and quickly arbitraged away, assessing qualitative factors is more challenging – and therefore more rewarding for assessing value. In other words, pricing power counts, but the factors driving it cannot always be counted. And that brings opportunities for equity investors seeking to build robust portfolios over the long term.

Want more content like this?

Sign up to receive our AIQ thought leadership content.

Apologies, this content is currently unnavailble.

Please enable javascript in your browser in order to see this content.

I acknowledge that I qualify as a professional client or institutional/qualified investor. By submitting these details, I confirm that I would like to receive thought leadership email updates from Aviva Investors, in addition to any other email subscription I may have with Aviva Investors. You can unsubscribe or tailor your email preferences at any time.

For more information, please visit our Privacy Policy.

Important information

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

In Europe this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK Issued by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805. Registered Office: St Helens, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In France, Aviva Investors France is a portfolio management company approved by the French Authority “Autorité des Marchés Financiers”, under n° GP 97-114, a limited liability company with Board of Directors and Supervisory Board, having a share capital of 17 793 700 euros, whose registered office is located at 14 rue Roquépine, 75008 Paris and registered in the Paris Company Register under n° 335 133 229. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1 Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 30, Collins Place, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.

Related views