4 minute read
Europe’s population is set to contract and age significantly over the coming decades, but the demographic shift won’t likely be uniform. Understanding this dynamic will be an important driver of real estate investment performance, explains Monika Sujkowska*.
For a region that is only now beginning its path to economic recovery after a decade characterized by two turbulent periods – the Global Financial Crisis and sovereign debt crisis – Europeans could be forgiven for hoping that the worst is behind them. But there is a longer-term issue on the horizon that could present sizeable challenges for the region over the next few decades. That said, the effects of it will probably not be felt evenly across the continent with some cities prospering while others suffer as a result.
The issue is demographics; specifically an aging and shrinking population. Europe is the only region in the world forecast to see its population fall by 2050, from 738 million in 2015 to 707 million, according to the United Nations. Along with rising life expectancy, a long period of relatively low fertility means that the median age of Europe’s population is expected to increase from 41.7 in 2015 to 46.2 by 2050.1
Demographic shifts in Europe aren’t likely to be uniform, however. Countries in Eastern and Southern Europe are likely to be worst affected, with the total population in these areas projected to shrink by 11% between 2015 and 2050. While the population is expected to expand elsewhere in Europe, Germany is forecast to be the only western European state to see its population contract by 2050.2
Demographics and the city
Even though the populations of most countries in Europe have long been predominantly urban, the share and number of people living in urban settlements is expected to continue to rise across the continent as more migrate from rural areas. The UN forecasts that urban Europeans will account for 82% of the continent’s population in 2050 compared with 73.6% in 2015.2
In aggregate, European cities generate 68% of output in the region from 59% of the population, according to a European Commission report. That said, urbanization favors some cities over others. Larger cities tend to be more successful at attracting incomers, especially capital cities. The populations of the capital cities of EU-15 countries grew by 8% between 2002 and 2012, compared with the total population growth of 5% in the bloc, according to the European Commission.3
Cities tend to have a higher share of the working-age population and lower share of people over 65 than rural areas. Large cities also tend to have more better-educated residents, higher employment rates, more innovation and higher productivity. That means the demographic outlook for cities can vary greatly.
For example, although Germany’s working-age population is set to drop by 9.8% between 2016 and 2030, better demographic prospects mean Munich is expected to have 7.5% more working-age citizens by 2030, while Leipzig should have 5.6% fewer over the same period, according to Oxford Economics. Similarly, in France the working-age population of Toulouse is projected to expand by 10.2% between 2016 and 2030 compared with 1.3% in Paris and a 3.4% contraction in Lille over the same period.4
Demographics and demand
The different demographic prospects for areas across Europe are likely to have a significant impact on the need for all types of real estate. Changes in the age profile of residents and workers is a significant driver of demand for real estate and strongly influence the type, functionality and locations that are likely to be popular.
For instance, demand for residential property is likely to be more directly impacted by demographic changes than other markets. While the size of the population is an important driver of demand, the age profile has a significant impact on the type of residential property likely to be sought. For instance, fewer young people implies less need for student housing, while more old citizens suggests increased demand for retirement housing.
Although demand for retail space may be more affected by structural shifts such as the rise of online shopping than the outlook for the population, changes in the size of surrounding populations generally affect the value of retail centers.
Turning to logistics, the sector is likely to benefit from population growth in selected locations. In addition, as more jobs are automated there will likely be less need to locate warehouses close to pools of cheap labor, meaning that transport links and proximity to markets may influence asset values more. This can add to demand for real estate in the most vibrant centers.
Finally, demand for office space is likely to increase in line with working-age populations in locations that boast a high share of knowledge-intensive activities, which are more resilient to the automation of jobs. The reverse is likely to be true in locations that rely on routine, low value-added employment, potentially offsetting any positive demographic changes.
We analyzed how demand for office space might be affected by anticipated changes in the working-age population in different European markets. In doing so, we disregarded the potential for a fall in floor space per worker due to increased flexible working or for labor market participation rates and retirement ages to rise. The analysis demonstrates the wide differential between markets. Barcelona is set to lose 838,000 square meters of occupied floor space between 2016 and 2030. By contrast, Stockholm is likely to need 1.2M square meters more over the same period, with demand boosted by persisting population growth on the back of higher birth rates and higher net migration than Barcelona.
Our analysis reinforces why real estate investors should benefit from analyzing the potential demographic impact on the market by city rather than by country or region.
A tale of two cities
As well as demographics, size and quality of the labor force, business environment, entrepreneurship, quality of governance, market access and level of innovation are other factors affecting the productivity of cities. In addition, cities generate agglomeration effects, such as the “matching, sharing and learning” benefits that quality firms reap from being in close proximity to each other.
By examining in which cities these attributes are most prominent, we can see which are best placed to benefit from higher productivity, stronger demographics and more robust real estate demand. Brussels and Paris show why a more nuanced view of a center’s long-run prospects is called for.
Brussels’ population is set to expand by 1% a year between 2016 and 2030.5 However, its economy is expected to underperform many European peers over the period, due to an over-reliance on public sector demand for commercial real estate space and relatively weak digital infrastructure and levels of human capital. Furthermore, the market is characterized by low barriers to entry and has suffered from periods of significant oversupply. So despite a reasonably robust demographic profile, pan-European investors may be well-advised to build their strategic presence in stronger European cities.
In contrast, the demographic outlook of Paris is less favorable, with expected average annual population growth of just 0.1% a year in 2016-30.6 However, the city benefits from agglomeration effects due to its large size.
Paris is an important international business hub with a large financial sector and many international corporate headquarters. The city has exceptional levels of human capital, including world-class universities and business schools as well as high levels of research and development activities. Paris attracts knowledge-intensive employment that tends to be highly resilient to technological disruption. Finally, it attracts extremely high numbers of tourists on the back of its cultural appeal; students due to its prestigious education institutions; and business people thanks to a large and diverse local economy.
These qualities explain why we favor Paris over Brussels. Such contrasting fortunes highlights why real estate investors should take a nuanced view of a city’s long-term prospects, with demographics one of a number of important factors to consider.
* Investment professionals are members of AIA/AIC's Participating Affiliate, Aviva Investors Global Services Limited ("AIGSL").
Source 3: The State of European Cities 2016, European Commission
Source 4: Oxford Economics, December 2016
Source 5: Oxford Economic Forecasts
Source 6: Oxford Economic Forecasts
Unless stated otherwise, any sources and opinions expressed are those of Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (Aviva Investors) as of July 31, 2017. Opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this presentation refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva Investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom.
For Use in Canada
Aviva Investors Canada, Inc (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is based within the North American region of the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. AIC is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager.
For Use in the United States
Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) and commodity pool operator (“CPO”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). In performing its services, AIA utilizes the services of investment professionals of affiliated investment advisory firms who are best positioned to provide the expertise required to manage a particular strategy or product. In keeping with applicable regulatory guidance, each such affiliate entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with AIA pursuant to which such affiliate is considered a “Participating Affiliate” of AIA as that term is used in relief granted by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission allowing US registered investment advisers to use portfolio management and trading resources of advisory affiliates subject to the supervision of a registered adviser. Investment professionals from AIA’s Participating Affiliates render portfolio management, research or trading services to clients of AIA. Investment professionals from the Participating Affiliate also render substantially similar portfolio management research or trading services to clients of advisory affiliates which may result in performance better or worse than presented herein. This means that the employees of the Participating Affiliate who are involved in the management of strategies and other products offered to US investors are supervised by AIA.
AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to:
225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250
Chicago, IL 60606