-
Chris UrwinDirector of Research, Real Assets
The logistics industry is in a state of flux due to rapidly-developing technologies and the increasing demands of consumers. A strategy which focuses on the demand and supply fundamentals of local markets is required to cut through this uncertainty.
3 minute read
In line with broader economic trends, new technologies and business models are transforming the logistics sector. The rapid growth of online shopping is driving change, with the Office for National Statistics estimating online now accounts for almost 20 per cent of all retail sales in the UK, up from less than five per cent in 2008.1 Meanwhile, rising expectations on the part of employees, business partners and particularly consumers are forcing companies to develop more reliable and responsive supply chains.
With the growth of e-commerce in its infancy, this is no short-term phenomenon. Online sales, for example, continue to grow at a double-digit pace. In addition, many products that are still purchased in physical stores appear vulnerable to further e-commerce penetration. This is especially the case for routine purchases where speed, efficiency and price are the chief concerns.
Strong rental growth but new technologies could disrupt
Landlords of logistics and industrial space have been clear beneficiaries of investment in supply chains, with the sector enjoying robust rental growth in recent years. According to the IPD Monthly Index, rents have been on an upward trend since the middle of 2013; the longest period of growth since the late 1980s. Over this period, average rents across the UK have risen by around 22 per cent.
While continued growth in delivery volumes appears probable, an array of new technologies could potentially disrupt the logistics sector.
While continued growth in delivery volumes appears probable, an array of new technologies could potentially disrupt the logistics sector. These include the Internet of Things, 3D printing, augmented reality, bionic enhancement, cloud logistics, robotics and self-driving vehicles. It is even possible technology might allow logistics sites to be used more efficiently, leading to a reduction in the amount of floorspace dedicated to this function.
Identifying markets with strong demand and restricted supply
The potential for technological change to disrupt the logistics markets creates an uncertain outlook for major players in the logistics sector, including occupiers, landlords, developers and planners. We are taking a two-pronged approach to adapt to the uncertainty, focusing on local markets with robust demand and supply fundamentals.
In terms of demand, this means assessing the factors determining where occupiers choose to base their facilities. Of key importance in these decisions are access to consumers and the availability of labour. Consequently, we have analysed demographic and drive time data to gain a clear understanding of the catchment populations of logistics locations across the country; combining this with a detailed assessment of supply and demand in local labour markets.
We also seek to identify markets with significant barriers to entry for new supply by analysing the local planning and policy backdrop and availability of land.
This analysis has identified various markets, detailed below, which we believe have the greatest potential for long-term rental growth.
Greater London
Greater London presents a mixed picture in terms of demand-side indicators.
Greater London presents a mixed picture in terms of demand-side indicators. Positively, it is particularly attractive in terms of access to consumers. But it cannot compete with the West Midlands in providing access to consumers on a country-wide basis. However, the scale and economic strength of the region mean that, within shorter drive times, it provides access to by far the greatest concentration of spending power. This ensures strong occupier demand. But high land values and demand for residential conversion mean logistics sites are scarce with existing sites at risk of change of use.
Greater Manchester
Due in particular to the scale of its local catchment, Greater Manchester scores highly on the demand-side analysis, while Manchester City Council is generally supportive of economic development where the case is strong. However, its dense urban character means there are limited opportunities for development within its local authority area.
West Midlands
The West Midlands scores highly in terms of demand-side fundamentals, with Birmingham particularly strong.
The West Midlands scores highly in terms of demand-side fundamentals, with Birmingham particularly strong. Around 90 per cent of the UK’s population can be reached within a four-hour drive. Only the South-East and the North-West provide access to more consumers and spending power in terms of a one-hour drive time.
In addition, the West Midlands scores well in terms of labour supply, with Birmingham offering the country’s largest pool of skilled and unskilled labour. On the supply side, the region is characterised by local authorities that are generally pro-development.
M1 Corridor from Luton to Rugby
Geographic and connectivity advantages mean markets in this corridor offer particularly good access to consumers at a country-wide level. As a result, they rank especially highly as potential locations for single-let logistics operations. Moreover, councils are generally not opposed to development.
M27 Corridor from Southampton to Portsmouth
Our focus on this market derives heavily from its supply-side constraints. Geography, the nature of surrounding areas and restrictive planning policies all serve to limit logistics development. On the demand side, the region does not provide the best access to consumers on a country-wide basis, but it does have good access to southern England with the wider urban area ranked as the eighth-largest metro area in the country.
References
- 'Comparing bricks and mortar store sales with online retail sales', Office for National Statistics, August 2018
Read the full paper: Safe as warehouses?
Building resilient logistics portfolios in uncertain times
Want more content like this?
Sign up to receive our AIQ thought leadership content.
Related views
Real Assets
Concentrate! How to benefit from specialisation and diversification in real estate
14 Apr. 2021
Too much emphasis on geographic and sector diversification within real estate portfolios can hinder alpha generation. More focus on lease length, asset quality and other factors is a preferred means of reducing specific risks whilst allowing specialisation, argues Tim Perry.
Read more
Real Assets
Five charts that show Copenhagen is a city of the future
7 Apr. 2021
We take a visual approach to highlight why Copenhagen is such a rich, vibrant and economically prosperous city.
Read more
Equities
What does the data say? Vaccines, illiquidity and managers called Dave
26 Mar. 2021
In the first of a new monthly series, we take a visual approach to illustrate topical data themes in economies, markets and beyond. This month we look at the correlation between stock market performance and vaccinations, the illiquidity premium in real assets, and whether there are still more men called Dave running funds than female managers.
Read more
Real Assets
Podcast: A clear green premium
18 Mar. 2021
Our Head of ESG, Ed Dixon, recently joined Blackstock Consulting on a PropCast episode to launch their new series of ESG insights with industry leaders. Together, they discussed how the government needs to be partnering with businesses to reach their climate pledges, how the “green premium” is yielding higher rents for eco-friendly offices, and much more.
Read more
Equities
Cut it out! The complex quest to decarbonise heating
16 Mar. 2021
More countries are contemplating their visions for a lower carbon world. Norway has excluded fossil fuels entirely for heating buildings, while others are taking a more nuanced approach. So, what are the options for those with environment at the heart of their agenda?
Read more
Real Assets
Can a shift in UK policy help make the ESG case for nuclear?
8 Mar. 2021
The UK government says nuclear energy may have a vital role to play in cutting carbon emissions. However, more detail is needed to help investors assess nuclear technology’s ESG credentials, argue Darryl Murphy and Stanley Kwong.
Read more
Real Assets
Can the UK Infrastructure Bank unleash the power of private capital?
5 Mar. 2021
Now that the details have emerged on the remit and tools available to the UK Infrastructure Bank, meaningful engagement with industry should be the priority, argues Darryl Murphy.
Read more
Real Assets
From crisis comes opportunity: What’s normal now?
2 Mar. 2021
Big challenges bring us the opportunity to think differently. Our investment teams reveal what they have learnt from COVID-19, and how they are preparing to face whatever ‘normal’ emerges in a post-pandemic world.
Read more
Real Assets
How Manchester transformed into a city of the future
26 Feb. 2021
Once an industrial powerhouse, Manchester reversed its decline to become one of Europe's top creative capitals. Watch our video to find out why we call it a city of the future.
Read more
Real Assets
RPI reform: The implications for real assets
22 Feb. 2021
With the methodology for calculating the UK Retail Prices Index set to change in 2030, we explore the implications for real assets.
Read more
Real Assets
Virtual reality: How COVID-19 is reshaping the world of work
27 Jan. 2021
While the coronavirus pandemic has devastated livelihoods, it also presents an opportunity for companies and policymakers to reinvent the world of work. The future is full of possibilities – but no easy answers.
Read more
Real Assets
Investing for impact in private debt to combat climate change
21 Jan. 2021
Impact investment strategies will have an important role to play if the green credentials of the world’s stock of real estate is to be transformed, argue Gregor Bamert and Stanley Kwong.
Read more
Real Assets
Building back better: The path to net zero
18 Jan. 2021
While much of the world’s focus continues to be on tackling the COVID-19 pandemic, the climate crisis also requires urgent attention. The number of countries and companies supporting the move to a lower-carbon world is growing, but practical challenges remain. How can we build back better after COVID, and navigate to a cleaner, safer and sustainable world?
Read more
Equities
Our annual letter to company chairpersons
15 Jan. 2021
As part of our engagement efforts, every January we send a letter to the chairs of companies we invest in (and some we don’t, but still want to use our influence with) to set out our stewardship priorities for the year. Here, in full, is our 2021 letter.
Read more
Real Assets
Hydrogen: Back to the future
18 Dec. 2020
The UK is the latest country to accelerate plans to develop hydrogen as part of its push to reach net zero. But it is not the first time hydrogen has attracted attention – it has been trumpeted by the scientific community as a possible wonder fuel for around a century. So, what’s changed now?
Read more
Real Assets
COVID recovery, net zero and policy: The outlook for UK infrastructure in 2021
16 Dec. 2020
Darryl Murphy assesses the current state of the UK infrastructure market and the likely drivers of activity in 2021.
Read more
Important information
Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). As at 11th January 2019. Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.
In the UK & Europe this material has been prepared and issued by AIGSL, registered in England No.1151805. Registered Office: St. Helen’s, 1 Undershaft, London, EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority. In France, Aviva Investors France is a portfolio management company approved by the French Authority “Autorité des Marchés Financiers”, under n° GP 97-114, a limited liability company with Board of Directors and Supervisory Board, having a share capital of 17 793 700 euros, whose registered office is located at 14 rue Roquépine, 75008 Paris and registered in the Paris Company Register under n° 335 133 229. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH, authorised by FINMA as a distributor of collective investment schemes.
In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 30, Collins Place, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) and commodity pool operator (“CPO”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606
RA19/0029/09012019