COVID-19: Is there still a premium for illiquidity?

One of the immediate consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic has been a marked reduction in investors’ risk appetite. But will their appetite for the illiquidity premium in private markets also disappear? Laurence Monnier explores.

9 minute read

COVID-19: Is there a still a premium for illiquidity?

Over the last decade, ever-dwindling yields in fixed income markets have pushed investors to look elsewhere to boost returns; either by allocating to riskier asset classes within public markets or to less liquid private assets such as real estate, infrastructure and private corporate debt.

A key driver for the increase in allocations to private assets was the belief they could pick up an illiquidity premium; in other words, higher expected returns, over publicly traded assets of broadly similar quality.1 But with bond spreads widening as a result of COVID-19 market stress and risk aversion from investors, two key questions emerge: what might happen to the illiquidity premium now; and how much appetite will investors have for illiquidity?

It is difficult to answer either question with any certainty, especially as transaction activity in private markets has been too limited to provide any meaningful insight on how much has changed during the pandemic. However, drawing on lessons learned from previous crises and an impact analysis of current macro and micro factors on private assets, this article summarises our perspective on what could happen to illiquidity premia over the next 24 months.

A divergence from the past

Investors looking for clues on how the illiquidity premium might be impacted by COVID-19 have, understandably, revisited the global financial crisis (GFC). Typically, Illiquidity premia are compressed during times of market dislocation, as private debt reprices slower than public equivalents. Conversely, they tend to be at their widest shortly after a recession, as public markets are quick to rebound but investors in private assets keep their discipline for longer. This is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Illiquidity premium for selected asset classes
Illiquidity premium for selected asset classes
Source: Aviva Investors

Despite some similarities with the past, the current situation has marked differences with previous crises, which could have different effects on the illiquidity premium:

  • Just as they did in response to the GFC, major central banks have injected liquidity to shore up markets. This time around, however, banks and other financial institutions are not the primary concern and are better placed to support companies.

    Even with central bank support, the impact on corporate defaults and unemployment will be severe, perhaps exceeding levels seen in recent recessions. The lockdown has impacted certain sectors particularly hard, such as retail, transport and hospitality; while others, such as healthcare and technology, have shown strong resilience.

    Impact: Given substantial monetary support, bond spreads will likely narrow more quickly than in past crises, but with greater divergence at a sector and company level.
Figure 2: Credit spreads of sterling investment grade bond index and selected sub-sectors
Credit spreads of sterling investment grade bond index and selected sub-sectors
Source: ICE BoA Merril Lynch, Bloomberg, Aviva Investors
  • Another difference with previous crisis is the sheer quantum of the fiscal stimulus deployed to support the economy, including non-traditional measures such as wage support and, critically, the offer of government guarantees on corporate loans. These measures far exceed the support provided in previous recessions.

    Impact: government support packages are likely to limit corporate defaults and loan margins.
Figure 3: Fiscal support Europe v other countries
Fiscal support Europe vs. other countries
Source: Macrobond, Aviva Investors
  • Banks’ share of the loans market has declined sharply since the financial crisis. According to S&P, global banks and securities only accounted for 24.2 per cent of the European leveraged loan market in 2019; in 2007 this figure was 43.6 per cent. So, while many government interventions to support companies will be channelled through banks, non-bank lenders will have a critical role to play in the recovery.

    Impact: Disintermediation of the lending market will increase the importance of non-bank investors. But given the varying impact of the crisis across industries, investors will be highly selective in their search for illiquidity premia.

So, what might happen to the illiquidity premium?

As was the case in previous recessions, the sizeable widening of spreads in public markets initially has reduced the illiquidity premium, as private markets are slower to reprice. However, performance has been markedly differentiated by sector and, as the chart above shows, the credit spreads for sectors less disrupted by COVID-19 are already narrowing substantially.

The illiquidity premium should be analysed on a like-for-like basis

Given this differentiation by sector, the use of broad public benchmarks can be misleading. The illiquidity premium should be analysed on a like-for-like basis and may be higher than a simple benchmark comparison would indicate.

A key difference with the GFC is that banks are not in the eye of the storm, and the cost to insure against bank default, as measured by credit default swap spreads, remains moderate. Banks’ funding costs remain relatively high, however, as shown in the Figure 4.

Figure 4: The gap between UK banks’ CDS and funding costs
The gap between UK banks’ CDS and funding costs
Source: Bloomberg, Aviva Investors

This makes higher quality private loans that are not eligible for government asset purchase programmes more costly to hold, which should offer more opportunities for non-bank players to finance highly-rated private transactions across Europe. It should also benefit private structured finance transactions, for example export credit agency guaranteed credits or swap repacks.

European governments have been quick to announce measures to support companies and their economies

Meanwhile, European governments have been quick to announce measures to support companies and their economies. Most of this support is channelled via banks, which benefit from reduced capital requirements and increased access to liquidity to finance loans. For example, the Bank of England’s Term Funding Scheme with additional incentives for small and medium-sized enterprises (TFSME) offers banks four years’ funding at close to the base rate, with the volume they can access dependent on how much they lend to SMEs.

At the same time, governments have put in place comprehensive measures to assist companies more directly, including support to pay wages; tax relief and guarantees on bank loans. The schematic in Figure 5 presents some of the measures put in place and their impact on the illiquidity premium.

Figure 5: Policy measures and the illiquidity premium
Policy measures and the illiquidity premium
Source: Aviva Investors

Loan guarantee schemes represent a significant departure from the past. In France, for instance, the government has offered to guarantee up to €300 billion of corporate loans this year; over €50 billion had already been approved by April 302. Considering that the average flow of credit to companies for the three years to 2018 had been €168 billion,3 the scale of government intervention in the loan market is clear.

The conditions attached to these programmes could present a diverse set of opportunities for investors across jurisdictions

Each country has rules and exclusions for their schemes. In the UK, help is available to small businesses that derive more than half of their income from trading. But this won’t benefit everyone; property companies deriving all revenues from rents are not eligible, for instance. Take up in the UK has also been limited by other considerations. But the conditions attached to these programmes could present a diverse set of opportunities for investors across jurisdictions.

Position for the upswing

The tenor of guaranteed loans is not purely short term. In France, the loans can be extended for up to five years after the initial one-year term. Their cost is initially subsidised: in the UK, the first 12 months interest is paid by the government, while in France banks have committed to provide such loans at cost, plus a guarantee fee – which increases as the loan tenor is extended.

Large volumes of such loans could weigh on the premium available in the corporate loan market for a while. Despite this, there could be strong funding opportunities for investors with an attractive premium over the next 12 to 18 months.

Firstly, the size of asset purchase programmes and improving market sentiment have already started to drive down public bond yields, particularly in the investment grade market. In the US, the Federal Reserve has extended its bond buying programme to crossover credits and the European Central Bank has announced that it will accept BB bonds as collateral. These measures have reduced credit spreads for securities in scope and are likely to remain in place for as long as is necessary.

Furthermore, if governments are successful in transitioning societies and economies out of lockdown, we would expect the reduction in public spreads to accelerate, restoring the illiquidity premium.

Thirdly, there will be strong incentives for banks and governments to refinance government guaranteed loans, using institutional capital as soon as possible. Banks will want to manage down their exposure and concentration, freeing up capital for new transactions. Governments, meanwhile, will want to limit the size of their contingent liabilities. Borrowers will want to be free of the restrictions and covenants attached to these loans (for example, limits on their ability to pay dividends) and diversify their sources of funding.

Such is the divergence at a company, sector and market level, more granular analysis is needed

So, while there is considerable uncertainty on the economic outlook, these factors should yield significant opportunity for investors to finance transactions as and when the recovery takes hold. In summary, while the current crisis is likely to have a negative impact on the overall illiquidity premium, such is the divergence at a company, sector and market level, more granular analysis is needed.

In the near term, we still see value in higher-rated and structured private credit. Given the level of market dislocation experienced in recent months, good opportunities will also exist elsewhere for investors with flexible mandates. Further ahead, there is a good argument to expect a broader rebound over the next 18 months. Investors that have done their due diligence and been selective in their allocations will be well positioned to benefit.

References

  1. Aviva Investors’ real assets research team has been closely monitoring the illiquidity premia available in private debt markets for the past two years
  2. ‘Fonds de solidarité et Prêts garantis par l’Etat : les données en accès libre’, French Ministry of Finance, April 30, 2020
  3. Eurostat: private sector credit flows, loans by sector

Want more content like this?

Sign up to receive our AIQ thought leadership content.

Apologies, this content is currently unnavailble.

Please enable javascript in your browser in order to see this content.

I acknowledge that I qualify as a professional client or institutional/qualified investor. By submitting these details, I confirm that I would like to receive thought leadership email updates from Aviva Investors, in addition to any other email subscription I may have with Aviva Investors. You can unsubscribe or tailor your email preferences at any time.

For more information, please visit our Privacy Policy.

Important information

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL) as at May 22, 2020. Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

In the UK & Europe this material has been prepared and issued by AIGSL, registered in England No.1151805. Registered Office: St. Helen’s, 1 Undershaft, London, EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority. In France, Aviva Investors France is a portfolio management company approved by the French Authority “Autorité des Marchés Financiers”, under n° GP 97-114, a limited liability company with Board of Directors and Supervisory Board, having a share capital of 17 793 700 euros, whose registered office is located at 14 rue Roquépine, 75008 Paris and registered in the Paris Company Register under n° 335 133 229. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material.  AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 30, Collins Place, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”).  AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.

Related views