• Equities

India elections: Modi’s second chance?

India’s prime minister Narendra Modi is facing pressing economic, social and political issues in the upcoming general election. Portfolio manager Aaron Armstrong, upon his return from an investment research trip to Mumbai, looks at the key implications for investors.

3 minute read

India’s prime minister Narendra Modi
arindambanerjee / Shutterstock.com

Narendra Modi made history in 2014, leading the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to become the nation’s first party other than Congress to win a majority in the lower house of parliament. Modi and the BJP swept to power on promises of reinvigorating a lagging economy and cracking down on corruption. At the end of Modi’s five-year term, however, his scorecard is mixed. Growth is below expectations, while unemployment remains a key challenge. Moves to undermine central bank independence and a populist tilt heading into the election have also raised eyebrows.

Despite these challenges, his government has made progress on some crucial economic reforms. Meanwhile, the MSCI India Index has outperformed the broader emerging market universe in US dollar terms in the past year, returning 3.9 per cent in the 12 months to 31 March 2019, compared to a decline of about 9.5 per cent in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. (See chart below.)    

MSCI Emerging Markets Index

Aaron Armstrong, global emerging market equities portfolio manager at Aviva Investors, explains why India’s 2019 upcoming election – to be held between April 11 and May 19 - has the potential to either take the country and its economy around a corner or a step back, and where he sees the most attractive investment opportunities. 

What’s at stake in the upcoming elections?

Our base case scenario is for the BJP to lead a strong National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition. A lot depends on the number of seats the BJP wins in the lower house; a minimum of 230 to 240 seats will be needed to provide a strong power base on which to build a coalition. In this scenario, the current reform and development-focused policy set would likely continue. 

A weaker BJP-led coalition would prove less stable for financial markets, but the worst-case scenario would be a Congress-led government. For investors, the fear is a possible return to an economic manifesto based on handouts and income guarantees. However, the latter scenario is remote at this stage.

How do the BJP and the Congress Party compare?

Modi and the BJP in 2014 campaigned on promises of a more vibrant economy. The government has raised infrastructure investments and improved the ease of doing business, but a revival in economic growth or employment remains elusive.

While a softer economy is a significant detractor from the BJP’s re-election bid, the opposition is not in a position to capitalise on the opportunity. The Congress party lacks a popular leader with a sufficient public persona to challenge Narendra Modi and a clear set of policies to address the needs of modern India.

How is the election affecting policymaking?

Predictably, a degree of populism has crept into fiscal policy, with the government using higher spending to target rural voters. Furthermore, the government abruptly replaced the central bank governor in December 2018 with an insider appointment more aligned to its political agenda; the change has resulted in looser monetary policy in the run-up to the elections. While this raises long-term questions about central bank independence, lower rates may provide a modest boost to the economy.

What about the government’s 2016 banknote demonetisation, which was heavily criticised?

This is possibly the most misunderstood issue of Modi’s tenure. In November 2016, 86 per cent of India’s banknotes (by value) were unexpectedly withdrawn from use, becoming worthless overnight. The policy forced everyone holding the two largest-denomination banknotes to declare their holdings at a local bank branch in exchange for new notes.

One aim of the policy was to flush out illegitimately earned ‘black money’ from the system. In practice, however, a far higher percentage of notes were legitimately exchanged than expected; in this regard, the initiative’s impact fell short of expectations. To focus on this factor, however, is to miss the importance around the formalisation of the financial savings system. Demonetisation forced millions of households to use formal banking services for the first time, helping to integrate them into the formal economy. In addition, the move will help mobilise billions of dollars in savings currently residing in unproductive physical assets such as gold and banknotes. Wealth and income declaration will also improve tax compliance, boosting government revenue.

Is the Pakistan situation an election risk, or opportunity, for Modi?

If you look back to 2014, there’s a stark difference in India-Pakistan relations. Modi invited Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to his inauguration in Delhi, and the early stages of the relationship were relatively stable in a historical context. However, tensions flared two years ago and again earlier this year when a Pakistan-based jihadist group claimed responsibility for an attack killing 40 Indian paramilitary policemen. The successful missile attack of a low orbit satellite in March was another nationalist move, demonstrating India’s space capabilities. Modi’s increasingly nationalist stance in response to these tensions has significantly boosted him and his party in recent polls.

India is often compared to China when tracking its economic progress. Will India follow a similar path to economic development?

The direction will be similar, but the way India arrives at that destination will likely be very different to China. While there are similarities, such as the potential for urbanisation and rising income standards, China's growth over the last thirty years was to a large extent driven by state policy. Conversely, growth in India’s economy is more determined by market forces and profit-maximisation incentives rather than concerted efforts dictated by a centralised government. On that basis, India’s journey could well prove bumpier than China’s, with a greater emphasis on private sector companies to drive the economy. This is a key point of differentiation for investors, with important implications for active stock picking in India’s more entrepreneurial environment.

Where do you see opportunities?

Financial markets are reflecting a higher probability of a Modi-led government, both in terms of equity markets and foreign investment flows. In this environment, higher beta stocks tend to outperform. The financial and infrastructure sectors stand out as being among those where investor sentiment is particularly aligned to the political outlook. 

Author

Related views

Important information

THIS IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. Some data shown are hypothetical or projected and may not come to pass as stated due to changes in market conditions and are not guarantees of future outcomes. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

The information contained herein is for general guidance only. It is the responsibility of any person or persons in possession of this information to inform themselves of, and to observe, all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction. The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.

In Europe, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK, this document is by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805. Registered Office: St Helens, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1 Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583.

In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business address: Level 27, 101 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom.

Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is based within the North American region of the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. AIC is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission as a commodity trading manager, exempt market dealer, portfolio manager and investment fund manager. AIC is also registered as an exempt market dealer and portfolio manager in each province of Canada and may also be registered as an investment fund manager in certain other applicable provinces.

Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.