Gregor Bamert discusses what lies ahead for the sector in 2023.

Read this article to understand:

  • Why the outlook for real estate debt is improving after a challenging period 
  • The potential opportunities stemming from a funding gap between senior and junior debt
  • Why amending existing loans to incorporate sustainable KPIs could be a theme this year

After demonstrating resilience in the first three quarters of 2022, the fourth quarter finally saw the UK real estate sector dragged into the maelstrom that affected all risk assets last year. Rampant inflation, rising interest rates and higher borrowing costs combined to cause a sharp depreciation in capital values, with the UK MSCI UK Quarterly Property Index recording a negative total return of -11.9 per cent in Q4, the biggest decline since the global financial crisis of 2008.1

The returns story was replicated in real estate debt transaction volumes. In the year to September, transaction volumes were running ahead of the previous year and the five-year average.2 But surging rates, and the fallout from the “mini-budget” in September brought that momentum to a shuddering halt. December’s transaction volumes of £2.4 billion was the weakest end to a year since 2000 and is almost 80 per cent below the five-year December average. The full-year figure of £56 billion was around six per cent below the five-year average.3

After the recent turbulence, will calm be restored to real estate debt in 2023? To answer this and more, we put the questions to Gregor Bamert, head of real estate debt at Aviva Investors.

What is your overall outlook for 2023?

We are more positive about opportunities in 2023. Last year, particularly the latter part, was characterised by uncertainty. It was difficult to have conviction in certain transactions and investment approaches. But now we can see a clearer path, both at the macro level and within the sector.

We have seen a reasonable uptick in activity since the start of the year

We have seen a reasonable uptick in activity since the start of the year. For real estate debt, the gestation period of a transaction is around three months; the fact we are busy now means we are looking to close many deals in the spring.

Additionally, we have not yet seen a wave of distressed transactions that some were forecasting late last year. Whether that is just a question of time or whether that doesn’t materialise is still a question. What I would say is that there are certainly situations where leverage levels, particularly around upcoming refinancings, will need to come down and a solution will need to be found.

Real estate debt experienced a more immediate reaction than other real asset sectors to the rising rate environment. Has pricing settled into a new equilibrium?

Not across the board. In some ways, it is helpful that the pricing movements were as fast as they were. The logistics sector has strong underlying dynamics, but yields had gone too low, and so we saw a quick adjustment. That recalibration was a catalyst for some market participants to get involved again. It is less helpful when capital values gradually drift down for a prolonged period; it’s hard to find the right entry point and understand what to factor in.

The yields needed to adjust in the logistics area

Differentiating from those areas where it is just a matter of yield shift is vital. In logistics, despite strong underlying occupier demand and rental growth, yields needed to adjust. In other sectors, there is more of a structural realignment. The differentiation between office buildings providing a place where people can collaborate and be inspired versus the ones that don’t offer that experience has not yet fully played through valuations.

In which sectors are you seeing attractive opportunities, including any areas where valuations now offer a more attractive entry point?

What matters is your level of confidence on the trajectory of income. We touched on logistics; there are opportunities there. We also see opportunities in the living sector, such as in rented residential as well as student accommodation; and in the office sector where, with the right plan in place, you can turn around a building in a good location.

You often have an obligation to revalue the asset on a regular basis in loan agreements

In terms of the impact of valuations, often in loan agreements you have an obligation to revalue the asset on a regular basis. When you come into a period of uncertainty, lenders will wonder whether it’s the right time to do that assessment. This is to understand the health of the borrower’s book to get a better sense of what the true loan-to-value should be; and whether any actions are needed to protect the lender's position.

We are fortunate because we have a proprietary dynamic model that re-values the assets in our book monthly. So, in periods where we see such significant changes, we can replicate that in close to real time. That allows us to prioritise where our focus needs to be, but also look at opportunities.

You touched on origination picking up; does that reflect both lender and borrower appetite?

Yes. We had some erratic movements in longer-term rates, both in gilts and the swap market. That made it very difficult for a borrower to know what the borrowing costs are going to be. Now that we are seeing a degree of stabilisation in the broader yield environment, and the trajectory of where rates are going seems clearer, it is time to lock-in that financing.

There's a gap in the funding market where senior lenders may be pulling back slightly on LTVs

There's also a gap in the funding market where senior lenders may be pulling back slightly on LTVs or focusing more on core properties. If somebody has a refinancing coming up in the near term, it's probably better to move sooner rather than to wait, as there won’t be unlimited capacity for that sort of refinancing.

We see the funding gap as an opportunity. There are transactions where you have solid underlying property fundamentals with good sponsors, but the metrics around debt servicing costs and leverage may not be favourable from a purely senior debt perspective. That means the senior lender will lend you less money, which leaves a borrower with three options: injecting more equity, selling the asset rather than repaying, or trying to source additional leverage.

In such situations, there may be an opportunity to work closely with sponsors and provide a solution, which from a return perspective can be very attractive to investors. By providing such refinancing solutions through whole loans or other structures, investors can look at returns more typical of equity investment with a lower risk. This is an area we are actively looking at.

A recent article in the Financial Times referenced a major US real estate developer “giving the keys back to the bank” on certain assets that no longer made economic sense. Do you have any thoughts on that?

The turbulence and uncertainty of recent years have highlighted the range of skills required for commercial real estate owners to be successful. Aside from having clear strategies and a strong grasp of property fundamentals, a detailed understanding of the needs of occupiers and investors, innovative approaches to place making, leadership in sustainability, creative design and appreciation of longer-term trends have all been key factors.

We focus our attentions on borrowers demonstrating the skill, engagement and commitment for success over the medium and long term

From time to time, we also see some property owners trying a much simpler route rather than using the above skills. They apply considerable leverage and walk away when there are any difficulties. From a lending perspective, we have no appetite to engage with borrowers following this strategy and focus our attentions on those demonstrating the skill, engagement and commitment for success over the medium and long term.

What's the outlook for sustainability-linked loans?

Activity in that area was a bit lower during Q4 last year, which simply reflected what was going on in the wider market. The proportion of sustainable transition loans last year for our overall activity rose from around 50 to 55 per cent over 2021 levels. We anticipate that proportion will grow further in 2023.

Adapting existing loans to incorporate sustainability metrics could become a key theme this year

We are working on a number of sizable transactions, including several in the office sector, where we are working with sponsors to execute a business plan that will see improvements to existing assets in attractive locations. Adapting existing loans to incorporate sustainability metrics could become a key theme this year, and it is an area we are actively looking at.

What about client demand?

The dialogue has definitely become more constructive since the turn of the year. Whereas liquidity was the big theme in late 2022, existing investors and potential new clients are looking past that and asking where the opportunities are to get a broadly attractive return over public markets across the medium to longer term.

Related views

Important information

THIS IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but, has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. Some data shown are hypothetical or projected and may not come to pass as stated due to changes in market conditions and are not guarantees of future outcomes. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

The information contained herein is for general guidance only. It is the responsibility of any person or persons in possession of this information to inform themselves of, and to observe, all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction. The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.

In Europe this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK Issued by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805. Registered Office: 80 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 4AE.  Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material.  AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act 2001 and is an Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act 2001. Registered Office: 138 Market Street, #05-01 CapitaGreen, Singapore 048946. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organisation of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom.

Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is based within the North American region of the global organisation of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. AIC is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission as a commodity trading manager, exempt market dealer, portfolio manager and investment fund manager. AIC is also registered as an exempt market dealer and portfolio manager in each province and territory of Canada and may also be registered as an investment fund manager in certain other applicable provinces.

Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”).  AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606