The results of the recent European elections, in which Green politicians made a surprisingly strong showing, were just the latest indication that Europeans’ attitudes to environmental issues are shifting.
3 minute read
A poll from the Pew Research Centre earlier this year found climate change was now seen as the top global threat in most European countries, trumping even the danger of ISIS-related terrorism. It will no longer be possible to conduct the suitability assessment without ESG being part of the conversation.
That would suggest environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria, which have been gaining traction within mainstream institutional investing in Europe, have the potential to start shaping the retail investment landscape to a much bigger extent too. If this is to happen, regulatory changes which are about to be introduced by the European Commission could have a crucial role to play.
Surveys suggest most retail investors want to ensure their values are reflected in the way their money is invested. Unfortunately, at present this happens all too rarely. That is primarily because so few financial advisers ask clients whether they have any ESG preferences, let alone whether they would like them to be reflected in the advice they receive or what their portfolio is invested in. Paradoxically, it appears advisers don’t ask about their clients’ ESG preferences because they are not mentioned by them, but the clients don’t mention any ESG preferences because the adviser hasn’t asked about them. The European Commission is looking to address this ludicrous situation by introducing legislation that would mean understanding a client’s ESG preferences would be weaved throughout the fabric of the suitability assessment carried out by advisors.
When enacted, the legislation will ensure they have to ask their clients about any ESG preferences and integrate them into the investment advice they provide. For example, advisors would need to reference any ESG preferences when explaining how they have reached their investment conclusions and when describing the nature and risk of their proposed course of action. Moreover, firms’ policies and procedures will need to be updated so they can demonstrate they understand their clients’ ESG preferences.
In other words, it will no longer be possible to conduct the suitability assessment without ESG being part of the conversation. Clients may not have such preferences of course, or they may put other elements of their objectives higher on their list of priorities. But at least they will be asked. We warmly welcome these proposals and believe the EU Commission deserves enormous credit. Having said that, we believe it needs to make sure it gets the detail of the legislation right if it is to ensure clients are given the broadest range of options, in line with their preferences.
At present, the draft legislation defines ESG preferences as “a client’s or potential client’s choice as to whether and which environmentally sustainable investments, social investments or good governance investments should be integrated into his or her investment strategy”. Sustainable investments are in turn narrowly defined as an investment in an economic activity that contributes to an environmental objective.
The legislation as currently drafted assumes all clients with ESG preferences are exclusively interested in increasing the exposure of their portfolio to economic activities that contribute to an environmental or social objective, subject to good governance and doing no harm to those objectives.
We believe while the definition of sustainable investments may accord with some people’s ESG preferences, there is a much wider spectrum of preferences that the suitability test needs to take account of. For example, we would like to see it encompass a whole range of sustainable investment approaches including negative screening, stewardship, and impact investments. Moreover, we believe investors want to see what impact their investment strategy is having in the real world.
Research suggests most clients with ESG preferences want to use their influence to favour positive outcomes in the real economy – such as changes in the investment decisions made by the investee companies – and expect evidence regarding the effectiveness of the investment techniques used. In our opinion, the definition of ESG preferences should be client-led, with the assistance of advisers or tools to outline the possible options and explain what they mean for clients, not pre-determined by a narrower version of what sustainable investment might mean.
There is no shortage of evidence that ESG factors, particularly relating to climate change, are important to members of society, particularly millennials. Furthermore, many of these people wish to see their values reflected in the companies they spend their money with and that they entrust their money to. Too few members of society understand how the financial system works and realise that through their pension and investments they are the ultimate shareholders of companies that affect every aspect of our day-to-day lives. This is their money.
Although financial advisers play a key role in helping them meet their investment objectives, for too long retail clients have not even known it was possible to invest in a way that reflected their values, let alone been given an opportunity to do so. Making sure clients are asked the question about their ESG preferences and can have a conversation about how they want their money to be used, should go a long way towards improving matters.
This article originally appeared on Responsible Investor.
Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL) as at 8 August 2019. Unless stated otherwise, any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.
In the UK & Europe, this material has been prepared and issued by AIGSL, registered in England No.1151805. Registered Office: St. Helen’s, 1 Undershaft, London, EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority. In France, Aviva Investors France is a portfolio management company approved by the French Authority “Autorité des Marchés Financiers”, under n° GP 97-114, a limited liability company with Board of Directors and Supervisory Board, having a share capital of 17 793 700 euros, whose registered office is located at 14 rue Roquépine, 75008 Paris and registered in the Paris Company Register under n° 335 133 229. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH, authorised by FINMA as a distributor of collective investment schemes.
In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1 Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 30, Collins Place, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) and commodity pool operator (“CPO”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.
Real assets and net zero: Now for the hard part
29 Oct 2020
There is no lack of willingness among investors in real assets to play their part in helping countries reach net zero by 2050. But much needs to change – and quickly, as Laurence Monnier explains.
Turn and face the change: How to invest dynamically in an uncertain world
21 Oct 2020
Equity markets are slow to price in the implications of change. This creates opportunities for dynamic, style-agnostic investors to take advantage, argue Caroline Galligan and David Cumming.
Fit for the future: Unboxing ESG in real assets
5 Oct 2020
Recent events have highlighted the importance of the environmental, social and governance characteristics of real asset investments – not only as part of COVID-19 recovery programmes, but also as a way of futureproofing portfolios.
The evolution of ESG: More than just a risk mitigator
21 Jul 2020
Once dismissed as a virtuous endeavour that compromised investment returns, the ability to gain a more holistic view of risk by considering environmental, social and governance factors is increasingly appreciated by investors. We assess the evolution of ESG across asset classes, as well as its role as a risk mitigator and opportunity spotter.
Health first: Finding resilience in pharmaceuticals
2 Jul 2020
COVID-19 has led to a new appreciation of the importance of healthcare in ensuring all members of society thrive. So where should investors be looking to find resilience in an industry facing enormous change?
COVID-19, comp and doing the right thing: Why corporate values have never been more critical
16 Jun 2020
With annual general meetings now taking place virtually, shareholders, employees and suppliers have had to adjust to lockdowns. While some of the immediate impacts will be phased out with the opening of the economy, stewardship priorities and corporate values may change forever.
Evidence and ambition: The new rules of engagement on climate change
15 Jun 2020
Mirza Baig explains why far-off commitments on climate change by energy companies and their lenders are no longer enough, and why COVID-19 has catalysed rather than derailed investor engagement on the issue.
Will COVID-19 prove a watershed for ESG?
14 May 2020
COVID-19 has thrown new light on the interdependencies in human and natural ecosystems, and the vulnerabilities of a closely networked world. Aviva Investors’ responsible investment specialists ask whether this will prove a turning point for environmental, social and governance issues.
The AIQ Podcast
The AIQ Podcast: Climate emergency
6 May 2020
This latest episode of the AIQ Podcast goes back to basics on climate: we explore leading scientists’ understanding of how the world is changing, as well as the investment community’s response.
The AIQ Podcast
The AIQ Podcast: The psychology of climate change
4 Mar 2020
This latest episode of the AIQ Podcast explores the psychology of climate change and how to engage individuals in the quest for solutions.
Climate change: The journey from denial to crisis
28 Feb 2020
More than 40 years since a senior NASA scientist told US Congress of concerns about human activities disrupting the climate, experts are warning of an impending climate catastrophe and the financial sector is wrestling with the implications.
Why asset managers cannot be passive on climate change
28 Feb 2020
As active investors step up their engagement efforts on the climate crisis, discussions need to be at the CEO rather than board level, argues David Cumming.
Apathy, anger, action: The psychology of climate change
28 Feb 2020
Psychological barriers can prevent people from acting to avert the climate threat, even when they recognise the problem. So how can we best engage individuals, companies and communities in the quest for solutions?
Stranded! When assets become liabilities
28 Feb 2020
Until recently, many investors made light of dire warnings of the risks posed by assets becoming “stranded” by climate change. However, as the threat becomes reality, fears are mounting that whole industries could be wiped out.
‘Sticking’ it to carbon: The pros and cons of taxing emissions
28 Feb 2020
With governments urged to do more to tackle climate change, carbon taxes are being touted as a politically expedient solution.
Slash and burn: The link between land use and climate change
28 Feb 2020
Poor land management contributes to rising global temperatures. But solutions are emerging as new technologies improve farming efficiency and consumers shift towards climate-friendly diets.