If the world is to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement, the international financial architecture needs far stronger coordination under a re-tooled OECD, writes Steve Waygood.

On a sunny afternoon in September 1962, President John F. Kennedy strode onto the football field at Rice Stadium in Houston, Texas. Addressing the crowd from a podium on the turf, he announced his government’s ambition to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. His speech is justly famous for its vivid rhetoric, which captured imaginations across the world.

To do all this, and do it right, and do it first before the decade is out, then we must be bold

“We set sail on this sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people,” Kennedy said. “To do all this, and do it right, and do it first before the decade is out, then we must be bold.”

What is less remembered is the note of pragmatism in the speech: Kennedy went on to explain precisely how the US would achieve this monumental feat. He outlined the role of NASA in leading the Apollo missions and specified the amount of additional funding the government would make available to turn America’s spacefaring dream into reality – the “staggering sum” of $5.4 billion a year.1

The climate moonshot

The fight against climate change is often likened to Kennedy’s “moonshot”, and with good reason. Like the moon missions, it will require ambition, expertise, and an unprecedented marshalling of resources. But there are key differences.

For a start, climate change, with its globe-spanning effects and multidimensional feedback loops, is a much more complex technical problem than spaceflight – and far more expensive to solve. The International Energy Agency estimates it will cost at least $1 trillion a year to move the world economy onto a net-zero carbon basis.2 That dwarfs the total outlay on the Apollo missions, which came to $25 billion (around $150 billion today, taking inflation into account).

Climate action is also hampered by a lack of coordination. Imagine if Kennedy had set his target without articulating a plan, and simply trusted public agencies and institutions – along with private companies with wildly divergent incentives and interests – to find a way to deliver it. That’s a good analogy for the current state of the climate financing effort in the wake of the Paris Agreement – a space programme without NASA.

To mobilise the capital needed, we are relying on a patchwork of different organisations, most of which emerged in the service of a short-termist, shareholder-driven capitalist model that has proven wholly inadequate to the climate challenge. And although there are plenty of well-meaning climate initiatives, they are too often working at cross purposes.

A new role for the OECD

This is why Aviva Investors, as part of a coalition of 38 institutions from across the industry, is calling for reform of the global financial architecture ahead of the G20 meeting in Rome and the Conference of Parties (COP26) in Glasgow. By bringing together governments, multilateral organisations and financial institutions to implement an ambitious and coherent planning effort, we have an opportunity to deliver a smooth and just transition for the global economy.

Our central recommendation is that the OECD assumes a new role as convenor and host of an International Platform for Climate Finance

Our central recommendation is that the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) assumes a new role as convenor and host of an International Platform for Climate Finance (IPCF).3 This facility would provide technical support to countries to help them deliver on climate commitments, advise large private financial institutions on how to scale up their own climate contributions, and develop an overview of financing needs and opportunities at a global scale.

At first glance, the OECD might seem an odd candidate to lead reforms to the financial system. The organisation is often described, not without justification, as a “rich countries’ club”, and its role in the global economy is not always clear. But there are several reasons why the OECD fits the bill.

First, it is the pragmatic choice. The OECD is already well-funded, at around €380 million annually. It is also connected with the member states of the G20 and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, along with financial standards setters such as the Bank for International Settlements, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the International Organisation of Pension Supervisors. This means it will be ready to hit the ground running, sparing us the costly – and politically fraught – process of building a new intergovernmental organisation from scratch.

The OECD will be ready to hit the ground running, sparing us the costly process of building a new organisation

Second, it has the necessary expertise. With 2,500 specialists on its staff, many of whom are well-versed in the intricacies of climate finance, the OECD will be able to provide the requisite technical assistance to developed and developing countries, helping them to build financing strategies for their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), while also facilitating access to the resources of other multilateral institutions. In providing this support while expanding its membership, the OECD could shed the “rich countries” tag and foster truly global collaboration on climate finance.

Third, the OECD already has a track record of delivering an ambitious international capital allocation project. It was established in 1948 to administer the Marshall Plan, managing the funds that went towards reconstruction in Europe after the devastation of World War II. By leading the climate finance effort, the OECD would productively reconnect with its roots.

Lessons from history

In short, a re-tooled OECD-IPCF is the best way to coordinate action to drive a more sustainable future for the global financial system – to act as a NASA for the climate moonshot.

The forthcoming G20 and COP26 meetings present an ideal opportunity to put this plan into action

The forthcoming G20 and COP26 meetings present an ideal opportunity to put this plan into action. As a starting point, we recommend the G20 invite the OECD to develop proposals for a standing facility to provide a secretariat for the IPCF. The OECD will also need to update its Principles of Corporate Governance to integrate climate disclosures and start to factor net-zero country commitments into its assessment procedures for new members.

Over the longer term, the OECD could also host a biennial dialogue on transition strategy, comprising its members as well as representatives from international financial institutions, the UN Development System, key civil society and philanthropic players, and the private sector.

Connecting all levels of the system will be crucial – because reform isn’t just about directives from the top. For the financing effort to be successful, we must also galvanise the transition from the bottom up. One way to do this is to give individual investors everywhere more transparency on the climate implications of their pension holdings. Technological innovations, including digital tools with which individuals can make their voices heard at companies’ shareholder meetings, are already helping make the system more inclusive and democratic.4

One reason for the success of America’s moonshot was everyone involved knew what they had to do to make a difference

Think back to the NASA analogy: one reason for the success of America’s moonshot was the way high-level ambition translated into a wider sense of mission: everyone involved knew what they had to do to make a difference.

Famously, Kennedy’s visit to Houston in 1962 brought a chance encounter with a janitor who swept the corridors of the space centre. When the president asked what he was doing, the man replied: “I’m helping to put a man on the moon.”5

This is the kind of clarity of purpose we need to address the climate crisis. With a robust and coordinated global climate finance plan, we can ensure governments, multilateral institutions, companies and individuals work in harmony towards our shared goals. To do all this properly, before the planet burns, we must be bold.

Would you like to read the whole of AIQ: Cleaning up capitalism?

Subscribe to download a PDF copy or get a printed edition delivered directly to you.

Thank you for requesting a copy of our latest AIQ. We will send this to you shortly.

To keep up-to-date with our latest insights, please visit our main views page.

Please enable javascript in your browser in order to see this content.

Please select the format you wish to receive.

If you wish to receive a printed copy of AIQ, please enter your full postal address below.

I acknowledge that I qualify as a professional client or institutional/qualified investor. By submitting these details, I confirm that I would like to receive a digital and/or printed copy of the latest AIQ and receive thought leadership email updates from Aviva Investors, in addition to any other email subscription I may have with Aviva Investors. You can unsubscribe or tailor your email preferences at any time.

For more information, please visit our Privacy Policy.

View full edition online

AIQ: Cleaning Up Capitalism

To tackle the climate crisis, economies and markets need a systems reboot. In AIQ: Cleaning Up Capitalism, we examine what it will take to get us back on track to achieve net zero; from transforming the financial system and accounting, to decarbonising heavy industries and ensuring polluters pay.

Find out more
AIQ: Cleaning up capitalism

Important information

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. Some data shown are hypothetical or projected and may not come to pass as stated due to changes in market conditions and are not guarantees of future outcomes. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

In Europe this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK Issued by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805.  Registered Office: St Helens, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ.  Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material.  AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 30, Collins Place, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”).  AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.

Related views