Emerging markets have been hit by stern economic challenges in 2022. But many companies are proving resilient thanks to strong fundamentals, as our emerging market corporate debt team explain.

Read this article to understand:

  • How EM countries face diverging fortunes
  • The relative resilience of EM corporates
  • Why EM corporate debt investors need to be diligent and selective

In June 2022, Pakistan’s government made an unusual request of its citizens: drink less tea. Planning and development minister Ahsan Iqbal asked people “to cut down the consumption of tea by one to two cups” per day so the country could reduce the $600 million it spends annually on tea imports.1

A storm in a teacup, perhaps – but the story illustrates the acute pressures faced by emerging markets at a time of rising inflation, supply chain issues and global monetary policy tightening. 

Not all emerging economies are alike, however, and some debt markets are performing better than others. Many large emerging market companies are proving notably resilient, for example.

From Chinese tech behemoths to Indonesian consumer goods specialists, from Brazilian banks to Nigerian telecoms giants, these companies often boast strong balance sheets and retain access to funding. As such, they should be better positioned to withstand growth slowdowns and inflationary pressures than heavily indebted sovereigns. These firms could present attractive opportunities for investors during a turbulent period.

“The story of emerging markets in 2022 is partly about real weakness versus perceived weakness,” says Amy Kam, senior portfolio manager, emerging market debt at Aviva Investors. “Some regions have been hit harder than others by inflation and the tightening cycle and have underperformed as a result. But corporate fundamentals remain strong.”

Out of the frying pan…

Emerging markets were badly affected by the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, as China locked down, supply chains seized up and tourism slumped. And, just as they were making a tentative recovery, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February led to a spike in fuel and food prices; central banks subsequently tightened policy to tackle rising inflation. Foreign investors withdrew over $56 billion from emerging market bond funds over the first seven months of the year (although the rate of outflows eased somewhat in late July).2

Emerging markets should be more resilient than they were during the so-called Taper Tantrum of 2013

The impacts have diverged across emerging markets. Commodity exporters and countries with fiscal scope to shield restive populations from rising food and energy prices – such as larger Latin American economies – are in a stronger position than those in the immediate vicinity of the conflict in central and eastern Europe. Large commodity importers such as India, Turkey, and Egypt, along with more-indebted frontier market countries, could be particularly vulnerable as borrowing costs rise. 

Overall, however, emerging markets should be more resilient than they were during the so-called Taper Tantrum of 2013, when the Federal Reserve signalled it would reduce its asset purchases, a move that prompted similar levels of capital flight. With some exceptions, current account balances are more favourable nine years on; many economies also have deeper, more liquid domestic markets, lessening their dependence on foreign capital.3

“Most emerging market nations are in better shape to weather higher rates than they were in the run-up to the Taper Tantrum. Specifically, current account balances are much healthier, as are the level of foreign exchange reserves that can act as buffers as US liquidity conditions tighten,” says Nafez Zouk, emerging market sovereign analyst at Aviva Investors.

Improving corporate fundamentals

Emerging market companies are also a very different position than in 2013. One of the key stories of the last decade has been the ascent of innovative firms that have expanded beyond their domestic markets to wield clout on the global stage, such as Chinese tech giant Alibaba or Indian telecommunications company Reliance Jio. Issuance of emerging market corporate bonds has risen sharply; the market has grown much faster than developed market equivalents (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Growth of EM corporate bond issuance versus other debt markets
Source: BAML, June 2022

More pertinently, emerging market companies have also strengthened their balance sheets over this period. Leverage among emerging market companies is at its lowest level for ten years – and far below the average among US firms – while the interest coverage ratio, a measure of a company’s ability to service its debts, is at its highest level since 2012 (see Figures 2-4). During previous episodes of turmoil, overly leveraged emerging market companies had few buffers to absorb a slowdown and an associated decline in earnings; today, the picture is much more positive.

Figure 2: Net leverage of EM corporates versus US corporates (x)

Figure 3: Interest coverage of EM corporates versus US corporates (x)

Figure 4: Cash-to-debt positions of EM corporates versus US corporates (per cent)

Source: BAML, June 2022

These improving fundamentals are reflected in higher average credit ratings across the benchmark JPMorgan Corporate Emerging Markets Bond Index (CEMBI) than the sovereign-focused Emerging Market Bond Index (EMBI), at BBB- compared with BB+. This is partly due to CEMBI’s inclusion of investment-grade bonds from blue-chip companies in China, South Korea and Taiwan; the CEMBI features fewer high-yield issuers and fewer longer-duration bonds (which are more sensitive to rising rates) than the sovereign index. 

The CEMBI tends to outperform the EMBI during periods of market stress

The CEMBI tends to outperform the EMBI during periods of market stress: data shows the corporate index is less sensitive to changes in US Treasury yields than the sovereign index (see Figure 5). Credit spreads among CEMBI oil and gas companies are also less sensitive to fluctuations in the oil price than their developed-market peers. This reflects the preponderance of national-champion energy firms in the index, which can count on implicit government support when commodity prices fall.4

Figure 5: Spread between EM corporate and sovereign debt widens (per cent spread of 10-year US Treasury)
Spread between EM corporate and sovereign debt widens
Source: J.P. Morgan, June 30, 20225

Nevertheless, the market remains inefficient, and strong fundamentals are not always reflected in pricing. As a result, emerging market credit continues to offer value over both sovereign debt and developed market peers, Kam argues.

Although fundamentals have improved, there are still pricing dislocations

“Although fundamentals have improved, there are still pricing dislocations. Good emerging market companies still have to pay a pickup over developed market equivalents. And sentiment on emerging market companies continues to be affected by sovereign risk, notwithstanding the fundamental strengths of the issuer. These inefficiencies can be exploited by investors with the knowhow to navigate a broad and diverse market,” she says.

Be selective

There are risks, however. One key concern is the economic impact of China’s zero-COVID policy. Swiss investment bank UBS recently forecast China’s GDP would grow at three per cent in 2022 – lagging its target of 5.5 per cent – as lasting COVID restrictions and a lack of clarity on an exit strategy dampen corporate and consumer confidence.6 Indebtedness remains an issue in the Chinese property sector and among local government financing vehicles (LGFVs) – investment companies that finance infrastructure and real estate projects on behalf of local governments.

Kam says while the portfolios she helps oversee are overweight Chinese corporate debt, the holdings are concentrated in a small number of less heavily indebted sectors that are best able to withstand a tougher economic climate: either debt issued by companies with strong fundamentals or by strategically important state-owned enterprises.

Outflows of foreign capital remain an issue for sovereign and corporate issuers

Across the wider market, outflows of foreign capital remain an issue for sovereign and corporate issuers as the uncertain macroeconomic outlook weighs on sentiment. However, many emerging market companies proactively refinanced their debts in 2021 when interest rates were lower, meaning they have less need to tap international markets now (see Figure 6). This partly explains the slowdown in emerging market corporate debt issuance, which was $159 billion over the first six months of 2022, less than half of the total issuance of $537 billion in 2021.7

Figure 6. EM corporate bond issuance (US$bn)
EM corporate bond issuance
Source: J.P. Morgan, July 1, 20228

Emerging market commodity exporters, in particular, have shown disciplined liability management over recent years. As well as refinancing debt at affordable rates, many firms have opted to use the proceeds from high commodity prices to reduce overall debt levels rather than to pursue mergers and acquisitions or pay out higher dividends to shareholders. 

“The starting point for corporates coming into this crisis was relatively strong compared to sovereigns,” says Aaron Grehan, head of hard-currency emerging market debt at Aviva Investors. “It’s worth noting commodity exporters form a reasonable part of the corporate market. We have seen an improvement there, with decent results from the majority of companies, although some will be impacted by slowing economic growth.

Whenever there are signs of stress, that’s generally when you’re presented with opportunities

“Whenever there are signs of stress, that’s generally when you’re presented with opportunities. It’s about understanding those risks and how they will impact countries and companies. When I look back over the past ten years, our best and biggest opportunities have come from picking the winners or names relatively better off during periods of challenge,” Grehan adds.

He emphasises the need for debt investors to be selective, considering geographic and sector information and undertaking rigorous bottom-up, fundamental research that incorporates environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics. 

According to JP Morgan estimates, default rates for the overall CEMBI universe could be as high as 10.7 per cent in 2022. But, illustrating Grehan’s point about the need to be selective, that headline figure masks significant dispersion across regions. Excluding China (specifically its problematic property sector), Russia and Ukraine, JP Morgan forecasts the CEMBI default rate to end the year at 1.5 per cent; currently, year-to-date defaults for Middle Eastern and Latin American corporates in the index are running at zero and one per cent, respectively. 

Resilient companies

Companies with continued access to financing, a proven track record of earnings growth and declining leverage look best placed to stay resilient. 

Based on these criteria, certain companies and sectors stand out. Benefiting from elevated commodity prices and low leverage, energy firms have been among the better performers in 2022. Looking ahead, debt investors should focus on companies that can access liquidity from alternative funding sources, such as bank loans or local-currency bonds. This may prove a key advantage if conditions worsen.

Although fundamentals have improved, there are still pricing dislocations

“Understanding a company’s access to liquidity is an important consideration when analysing the relative strength of corporates. When the primary market is closed, they are more reliant on alternative funding sources of financing such as bank debt or local-currency bonds,” says Devin Cameron, corporate analyst, emerging market debt at Aviva Investors.

Cameron cites Indonesia’s MedcoEnergi as a company that retains such options. As the country’s largest domestic supplier of natural gas, it is strategically important, boasting strong relationships with local and international banks. Additionally, Medco has actively tapped Indonesia’s relatively deep local markets.9

Access to funding is also an important consideration in the emerging market financial sector, where banks have come under pressure to adjust their business models and prioritise liquidity preservation over profitability in recent months. High-quality banks with local-market funding options that can be accessed when international financing becomes trickier – such as Banco de Brasil and Mexico’s BBVA Bancomer – look to have relatively stronger prospects.

“Our focus remains on large, high-quality bank names with ample capital and liquidity reinforced by deep local market funding alternatives, such as those in Brazil, Mexico and South Africa,” says John Wright, financials credit analyst at Aviva Investors.

We see particular value in the subordinated debt instruments from the best-in-class names

“While the next six-to-12 months are likely to remain challenging, we expect the higher interest-rate regime and ongoing digitalisation of banking services to ultimately support both higher net-interest margins and profitability among these institutions. As such, we see particular value in subordinated debt instruments from the best-in-class names,” Wright adds.

Structural growth 

Elsewhere, companies that specialise in building and leasing telecommunications infrastructure in developing economies could offer opportunities for investors with an eye on short-term resilience and long-run profitability. These firms tend to present high, stable margins and long-term contracted revenues, providing visibility into future earnings.

One example is IHS Towers, a telecoms company founded in Lagos that now has operations across Africa, Latin America and the Middle East. The firm has long-term contracts with mobile network operators; importantly, these contracts are denominated in hard currency and inflation-linked, which means IHS should be able to pass on cost increases to offset pricing pressures. 

Tech-savvy populations are propelling strong data usage growth in as-yet underpenetrated markets across Africa and the Middle East

Longer-term demographic trends are also in the company’s favour: young, tech-savvy populations are propelling strong data usage growth in as-yet underpenetrated markets across Africa and the Middle East. This speaks to a broader point about emerging market companies during a turbulent period: they appear to be well positioned to benefit from secular growth over the coming years.

The IMF’s global economic outlook, published in July 2022, forecasts GDP growth of 6.8 per cent across emerging economies this year, outstripping the 5.2 per cent rate among advanced economies.10 And while growth is expected to slow to 3.6 per cent in 2023 and 3.9 per cent in 2024, these figures still comfortably exceed the expectations for developed economies (see Figure 7).

Figure 7: IMF growth outlook
Source: International Monetary Fund, July 202211

Emerging market companies with good fundamentals should be able to stay resilient in the face of economic growth challenges. And the vast size of the emerging market corporate debt universe, with its range of issuers across multiple sectors and geographies, gives investors the benefit of choice. 

“Over the longer term, emerging markets have far greater structural growth potential than developed markets, as high-growth tech and digital sectors start to play a bigger role in these economies. This could help investors deal with an environment of longer-term structural inflation,” says Kam. “For now, while waiting for clear signs of a broad-based rebound, we are focusing on bottom-up credit stories in emerging markets. The breadth and depth of these credit markets means there is plenty of scope to find resilient companies.”

References

  1. ‘Why is Pakistan’s government asking people to drink less tea?’, The Economist, June 21, 2022
  2. ‘EM flows weekly: EM retail bond outflows ease to the lowest level since early April’, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, July 29, 2022
  3. ‘Conflict, commodities and China: the outlook for EMD’, Aviva Investors, April 2022
  4. ‘2022 outlook: Crouching tiger, hidden returns’, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, July 2022
  5. ‘Guide to the markets’, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, June 30, 2022
  6. Ning Zhang, et al., ‘China economic perspectives’, UBS, June 2022
  7. Yang-Myung Hong, ‘EM corporate supply technicals’, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, July 1, 2022
  8. Yang-Myung Hong, ‘EM corporate supply technicals’, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, July 1, 2022
  9. ‘MedcoEnergi group bond information’, MedcoEnergi, August 2022
  10. ‘World economic outlook update’, International Monetary Fund, July 2022
  11. ‘World economic outlook update’, International Monetary Fund, July 2022

Related views

Want more content like this?

Sign up to receive our AIQ thought leadership content.

Thank you for subscribing to receive our upcoming AIQ thought leadership. You will receive a confirmation email shortly.

To view our current live content, please visit our Views hub.

Please enable javascript in your browser in order to see this content.

I acknowledge that I qualify as a professional client or institutional/qualified investor. By submitting these details, I confirm that I would like to receive thought leadership email updates from Aviva Investors, in addition to any other email subscription I may have with Aviva Investors. You can unsubscribe or tailor your email preferences at any time.

For more information, please visit our privacy notice.

Important information

THIS IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. Some data shown are hypothetical or projected and may not come to pass as stated due to changes in market conditions and are not guarantees of future outcomes. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

In Europe this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK Issued by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805. Registered Office: St Helens, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1 Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 27, 101 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000 Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas LLC ("AIA") is a federally registered investment advisor with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. AIA is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.