• Equities
  • Global Equity
  • Risk

Peak fear, prime opportunity

Why healthcare stocks could be on the mend

In the third of our global equity sector hub discussions, Joanna Tucka, healthcare sector hub lead, and Richard Saldanha, global equity portfolio manager, explore why all is not doom and gloom in healthcare.

Read this article to understand:

  • Why pharma investors shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater
  • How value-chain links and dynamics reveal risks and opportunities in the sector
  • The importance of finding a balance between positive views, selectivity and diversification

In the second quarter of 2025, relative to the S&P 500, the US healthcare sector produced its worst quarterly return in recent history (see Figure 1). In fact, the sector has been struggling since 2023 and appears very cheap on a relative basis. It is worth delving into the reasons why, and assessing whether it remains investable.

Figure 1: US healthcare valuations compared to the rest of the S&P 500 (per cent)

Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. For illustrative purposes only.

Source: Aviva Investors, Bloomberg. Data as of September 29, 2025.

Healthcare is currently caught in a perfect storm of policy, regulation, and stock-specific pressures. While these are largely driven by US political rhetoric, they affect all biopharma companies with commercial exposure to the US. 

On the policy side, three plans by the old and new US administrations are affecting investor sentiment: ongoing Medicare drug-price negotiations following the introduction of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2022, potential tariffs on pharmaceuticals, and the most-favoured nation (MFN) drug-pricing plan for government-funded healthcare.

Pharma companies often sell drugs at significantly higher prices in the US compared to other countries. The MFN proposal aims to force price reductions by benchmarking US drug prices against prices in a basket of developed markets. Implementing this plan would threaten the sector’s profit margins and has introduced considerable uncertainty for investors.

These difficulties have been compounded by layoffs within the US Food and Drug Administration and proposed cuts of up to 40 per cent in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget.1 Regulation is also impacting health insurance, through cutbacks and changes to the Affordable Care Act, Medicare and Medicaid.2

Meanwhile, several pharma companies are facing a huge patent cliff. Several “blockbuster” drugs are set to lose their patents in the coming years, setting up companies to shed profits as generics start selling lower-priced alternatives.3

As if this wasn’t enough, broader market trends have also weighed on healthcare – a defensive sector – as investor attention shifted toward artificial intelligence (AI) and tech stocks.

The good news

But it’s not all doom and gloom. With healthcare valuations nearing 35-year lows relative to the S&P 500, the bad news now appears priced in, and we think there are reasons to be more positive on the sector.

Despite initial concerns, DOGE-driven budget cuts don’t seem to have delayed drug approvals or commercialisation, and the FDA remains functional. And after fears of a 40 per cent cut, the NIH budget proposal looks set to at least remain flat.4

Pharmaceutical companies are adopting strategies to mitigate the risks

The sector is also continuing to prioritise innovation, with recent breakthroughs achieved in obesity, immunology and Alzheimer’s disease, as well as AI-driven improvements across different healthcare subsectors.

Moreover, the plans for pharmaceutical tariffs (Section 232 review), the next round of IRA negotiations and MFN pricing are still under review. Whatever happens with these, however, pharmaceutical companies are adopting strategies to mitigate the risks. Driven by tariff threats, they have announced multibillion-dollar capital expenditures to relocate to and expand drug manufacturing in the US.

Numerous major pharmaceutical companies are also embracing direct-to-consumer sales models to reduce drug pricing and improve patient access. And the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America recently announced the launch of AmericasMedicines.com, a new platform connecting patients with manufacturers’ direct purchase programmes. The site is set to go live in January 2026 and aims to bypass pharmacy benefit managers, offering lower-cost access to prescription drugs.5

Fight or flight?

Our healthcare sector hub experts have analysed the sector’s key value chains, assessing links and dependencies, and analysing the sub-sectors against the complex background of opportunities and threats, fundamentals and long-term growth drivers.

As a result, we believe that healthcare doesn’t deserve to be shunned entirely. Instead, investors with the right research skills and a long-term view can find selective opportunities.

Is healthcare’s fall from grace creating an entry point?

Although history doesn’t always repeat itself, in previous cases, the sector has tended to spike once it recovers from peak fear. That has led to strong payoffs for those who had invested when policy uncertainty was at its highest.

Today, although there are headwinds, they seem to be reaching – or even to have reached – peak fear, and severe changes to US healthcare now look unlikely.

Despite supportive factors, the sector is trading at a discount

Additionally, tailwinds like new product launches are emerging. Long-term growth drivers such as industry consolidation, ageing populations and the growth of prevention and opportunities in emerging markets, also remain intact.

And despite these supportive factors and strong fundamentals, the sector is currently trading at a substantial discount. We find that compelling, creating attractive entry points for medium- and long-term investors.

Historical returns in the sector have been solid, and many healthcare businesses are posting robust cash flows, dividends, and returns on capital. The dislocations created by the entire sector’s fall from grace create opportunities, but given the difficulties also at play, investors need to be selective.

It’s all in the value chain

The context today requires thorough research, firstly because there is no overarching theme obviously driving company growth and prospects. A few years ago, themes like obesity drugs or robotic surgery generated a lot of demand and excitement, giving investors relative safety in selecting related stocks. Despite continued innovation and product launches, there is no such theme at play in 2025.

Secondly, some uncertainty remains as to where policy changes may go next, and because the healthcare sub-sectors are interlinked, none can really be said to be insulated from policy risk. But some value chains are benefitting from more supportive conditions than others.

MedTech has been a shelter in the storm

Medical technology (MedTech) stocks have performed well this year and some could even benefit from initiatives in the US administration. For example, US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy Jr. is advocating for every American to use wearables to track their health metrics.This could be a boon for companies like Abbott Laboratories that produce wearable glucose monitors, among other products.7

Figure 2: MedTech value chain

MedTech design and produce medical devices. Hospitals use them, and laboratories run tests prescribed by hospitals. MCOs or health insurance cover part of their members' medical costs, including MedTech, procedures and tests.

Source: Aviva Investors, as of September 30, 2025.

Given the value-chain links, when MedTech is doing well, hospitals usually follow suit (and vice versa) because many of the devices need to be implanted by surgery or are used in medical procedures (see Figure 2). Conversely, when MedTech and hospitals are doing well and usage rates climb, health insurance suffers as claims rise (if they have not forecast the rise appropriately).

Some hospitals in Europe have also been performing well this year. German healthcare company Fresenius is a good example. It owns a nutrition and pharma company that has little exposure to the US, and 60 per cent of its overall revenues come from its hospitals in Spain and Germany. As a result, it is unlikely to be impacted by US tariffs and other policy moves.8

Investors need to be selective on pharma

Meanwhile, pharmaceuticals have a lot to grapple with, from pipeline risk to tariffs, MFN pricing plans and a public perception that American patients are overpaying for drugs (see Figure 3). As a result, it is harder for investors to identify winners in this sub-sector. For instance, although AstraZeneca’s product pipeline is strong, investors seem to be less enthused in this market environment.9

Similarly, biotech funding and pipelines are rather thin, which continues to be a drag on this sub-sector.

Figure 3: Pharmaceuticals value chain

Pharma and biotech develop and sell drugs. CROs conduct clinical trials for them. Life science tools include microscopes, beakers and others, as well as bioprocessing, which consists in producing biological drugs for biopharma. CDMOs design and produce specific molecules. Packaging produce specialised vials and syringes. Distributors distribute the drugs and molecules respecting strict requirements like cold storage.

Source: Aviva Investors, as of September 30, 2025.

Pharma derivatives are on a winding path to recovery

On the other hand, some parts of the value chain look slightly more insulated, such as drug distributors like McKesson. Again, no sub-sector can be completely insulated from the sector risks, and distributors’ performance relies on drug sales. But being low-margin businesses, the distributors do not seem to be as much in the US administration’s firing line, and McKesson’s share price has risen considerably (by almost 22 per cent between January 2 and September 18, 2025).10

Growth is unlikely to return to stellar levels, but future prospects are attractive

Meanwhile, life science tools, CDMOs and CROs all depend on biopharma’s research and development (R&D) spend and have therefore been impacted. However, after the recent pushback against the US administration’s proposed cuts to the NIH budgets, we are seeing small signs of stabilisation in tools and CROs, although we expect the recovery will be bumpy.

Life science tools stocks appear very oversold and have seen more earnings downgrades recently given concerns around recovery in their end-markets. However, given the NIH budget now seems likely to stay flat – or maybe even slightly positive – and bioprocessing continues to post reasonable growth levels, it looks like it might be slowly bouncing back. Growth is unlikely to return to the stellar levels we saw before the COVID19 pandemic, but we do think that future growth prospects are generally attractive, especially in well-diversified names.11

Stay positive but diversified

Digging deep into these sub-sectors and their dynamics reveals opportunities through dislocations, overlooked areas and relatively insulated businesses. But it also demonstrates the importance of diversifying within the broader healthcare sector. Taking exposure to the largest names only in pharmaceuticals and health insurers would expose a portfolio to most of the sector’s key headwinds.

In contrast, adding the right names from sub-sectors like MedTech, healthcare facilities or bioprocessing can diversify some of those risks and create return opportunities. Other sub-sectors in separate value chains can also be good diversifiers, such as dental and animal health providers, whose services are typically paid for directly by patients – or their owners – and are not impacted by potential cuts to the NIH budget or other policy measures.

Long-term prospects: Keeping an eye on AI

Over the much longer term, AI is being touted as a game-changer for healthcare, from personalised medicine to new proteins and improved diagnostics. A few AI companies are now listed, and the big pharmaceutical firms are all partnering with one or more specialists, in a variety of areas. In its 2024 annual report, AstraZeneca said it was applying AI to 85 per cent of its small molecule programmes, from target identification to clinical trial design. And Thermo Fisher Scientific is actively integrating artificial intelligence across its operations, products and customer solutions, with a stated focus on cost efficiency, product innovation and growth.12

It is too early to tell how much of this is hype, but we see potential

It is too early to tell how much of this is hype and which areas will be transformed but, as discussed more broadly in our tech sector hub, we see potential in the technology.13 For example, given the length and complexity of getting a new drug to market – which can take decades – the possibility that AI could help optimise and shorten the process could save biopharma firms significant amounts on their R&D investments. In turn, that could bolster investors’ returns, and we will continue to follow developments closely.

Greener pastures?

Despite the perfect storm hitting healthcare in 2025, delving deeper into its details and dynamics shows we may have passed peak fear. It also reveals opportunities that lie hidden in the thicket of market anxiety. Many risks still lie ahead, of course, and it is important to remain diversified. But in the current conditions, all our global equity portfolios are overweight healthcare and we are positive on the sector’s potential.

References

  1. Amy Baxter, “FDA’s job cuts paint mixed picture for drugmakers’ R&D plans”, PharmaVoice, April 28, 2025.
  2. Aliza Rosen, “How new federal legislation will affect health care costs and access for Americans”, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Heath, July 30, 2025.
  3. Catherine Eckford, “Next drug patent cliff to challenge Big Pharma strategy”, European Pharmaceutical Review, July 4, 2025.
  4. Bruce Y. Lee, “Senate Committee endorses NIH budget increase, snubs Trump’s 40% cut”, Forbes, August 6, 2025.
  5. Kamal Choudhury, et. al., “2US lobby group PhRMA plans website to boost access to cheaper drugs”, Reuters, September 29, 2025.
  6. Mary Kekatos, “RFK Jr. wants everyone to use wearables. What are the benefits, risks?”, ABC News, July 3, 2025.
  7.  The companies mentioned are for illustrative purposes only, not intended to be an investment recommendation.
  8.  The companies mentioned are for illustrative purposes only, not intended to be an investment recommendation.
  9.  The companies mentioned are for illustrative purposes only, not intended to be an investment recommendation.
  10.  The companies mentioned are for illustrative purposes only, not intended to be an investment recommendation.
  11.  The companies mentioned are for illustrative purposes only, not intended to be an investment recommendation.
  12. “How AI is creating value in digital products, services and processes”, Thermo Fisher Scientific, accessed September 29, 2025.
  13. Josep Bori, “AI and beyond: Opportunities amid tech turbulence”, Aviva Investors, April 3, 2025.

Discover our equities capabilities

Select from a broad range of actively managed funds focusing on growth, income or a combination of both from a variety of geographies and sectors.

Find out more
Equities capabilities

Subscribe to AIQ

Receive our insights on the big themes influencing financial markets and the global economy, from interest rates and inflation to technology and environmental change. 

Subscribe today
Subscribe to AIQ

Related views

Important information

THIS IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION

Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but, has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. Some data shown are hypothetical or projected and may not come to pass as stated due to changes in market conditions and are not guarantees of future outcomes. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

The information contained herein is for general guidance only. It is the responsibility of any person or persons in possession of this information to inform themselves of, and to observe, all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction. The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation..

In Europe, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK this is issued by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England and Wales No. 1151805. Registered Office: 80 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 4AE. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act 2001 and is an Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act 2001. Registered Office: 138 Market Street, #05-01 CapitaGreen, Singapore 048946. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

In Canada and the United States, this material is issued by Aviva Investors Canada Inc. (“AIC”). AIC is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission as a commodity trading manager, exempt market dealer, portfolio manager and investment fund manager. AIC is also registered as an exempt market dealer and portfolio manager in each province and territory of Canada and may also be registered as an investment fund manager in certain other applicable provinces. In the United States, AIC is registered as investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and as commodity trading adviser with the National Futures Association.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organisation of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the UK.