Emerging-market debt analyst Carmen Altenkirch reports back from the recent International Monetary Fund (IMF)/World Bank meetings in Washington.

Read this article to understand:

  • Why emerging-market nations and policymakers were in an upbeat mood at the recent IMF meetings.
  • How political necessity has been forcing EM countries to get debt onto a sustainable path.
  • Why policymakers are suddenly embracing the need for change and reform

Recent years have witnessed a sharp rise in yields across the emerging-market debt universe. This is partly explained by weaker developed government bond markets as the US Federal Reserve and other leading central banks hiked interest rates aggressively to try to bring inflation under control.

But emerging markets’ woes were compounded by concern over several countries’ debt trajectories and capacity to refinance debt in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine.

However, the past year has witnessed signs that many countries are starting to take more decisive policy action to address the economic challenges that had built up since 2020.

Against this backdrop, Aviva Investors’ emerging-market debt analyst Carmen Altenkirch recently travelled to Washington for the semi-annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. She spent the week engaging with policymakers and other officials and found them in a surprisingly upbeat mood, bolstering her belief many countries are willing to make the tough economic choices necessary to get their finances on a surer footing.

Despite a renewed rise in developed-market government bond yields since the start of 2024, Altenkirch sensed growing optimism that many countries have begun to turn a corner and that the risk of further defaults has receded, as she explains in this Q&A.

What were the key messages to come out of your meetings at the IMF/World Bank summit?

Recent years have seen the tradable universe within the higher-yielding segment of the EM debt market shrinking appreciably as several countries defaulted and even more lost the ability to refinance debt via capital markets. At the same time, there was a widespread reluctance to approach the IMF for assistance.

This meant a year ago there were very few countries that either looked in a decent place from a fundamental economic perspective, or where we thought there was sufficient prospect of a turnaround to make their bonds look attractive. As an investor, our opportunity set within the high-yield space was severely restricted.

But at the meetings in Washington there was a palpable sense that a growing number of countries have turned a corner or are in the process of doing so. What was striking at many of the meetings I attended was just how many policymakers acknowledged the need for change and reform.

We have seen a notable shift in Ecuador, which has now successfully agreed an IMF programme

In some cases, this was down to politicians’ acceptance that teetering on the edge of economic disaster will not do their chances of re-election any good. For example, we have seen a notable shift in Ecuador, which has now successfully agreed an IMF programme. President Daniel Noboa and his advisers tacitly acknowledged that without IMF support and reforms, their re-election prospects come May 2025 would likely be bleak.

In other cases, most obviously Turkey, elections in 2023 have already led to more orthodox economic policies being adopted. It is a similar story in Argentina. The country was complimented by IMF officials for its commitment to fiscal prudence as Luis Andrés Caputo, the economy minister, said the country had no option other than to live within its means.

A number of other nations similarly concluded they needed IMF support and are prepared to take the necessary reforms to secure it. In Pakistan, for example, with elections out of the way, politicians have begun to adopt a more pragmatic attitude towards seeking IMF support. Only four weeks into his job, finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb spoke about the need for an IMF programme and the importance of raising revenue. Gabon and Senegal are likely to be next.

Six months ago, high-yield issuers were finding themselves locked out of capital markets. Is this still the case?

No, more and more countries have been able to access capital markets. This was the other main positive message I took from Washington. At the previous IMF meetings in October there was much uncertainty as to whether high-yield borrowers would be able or even willing to issue debt at penal yields. Without market access, the risk was of another wave of defaults.

However, since then increased risk appetite among investors has driven yields down to around ten per cent. In the past, if a country were issuing at ten per cent, that would have sparked concern its debt position was not sustainable.

Ivory Coast, Benin, El Salvador and Kenya have sold bonds recently

But perhaps because we have seen such a big rise in US government bond yields, it now appears to be a level at which governments are prepared to borrow and investors willing to lend. This is especially true of countries which have shown over the past year or two they were able to consolidate budget deficits and rebuild reserves.

Initially, it was only the most economically resilient high-yield countries that were able to come to market, but more recently Ivory Coast, Benin, El Salvador and Kenya have sold bonds.

This time last year, there was a real risk of Kenya defaulting had it not been able to access the market. The fact it has been able to sell debt has enabled it to pay off maturing bonds and raise a small amount of additional financing. This, in conjunction with fiscal consolidation, means it is on a much more sustainable path.

Senegal is likely to be next, with its new government seemingly committed to reform in order to receive IMF support. It could be followed by Nigeria.

So have default risks abated entirely?

No. It is true that those countries which were most at risk have already defaulted.

Of the next tier of countries, some, such as Kenya, have been able to regain market access while Ecuador, Egypt and Pakistan have approached the IMF.

Some countries have yet to make much progress on negotiations to restructure their debt

But others have yet to make much progress on negotiations to restructure their debt. While Zambia’s restructuring is largely completed, Sri Lanka’s and Ghana’s still appear some way off, amid a dispute with creditors over the terms of any bailout.

Bondholders believe the IMF is being too conservative in terms of its debt sustainability assessment and are pushing for a way to benefit should economic outcomes be better than assumed. For its part, the IMF, along with official creditors, does not want to saddle vulnerable countries with an uncertain repayment profile. It remains to be seen how this is resolved.

While the situation for high-yield countries overall has improved, meaning another bout of defaults looks unlikely for now, many remain extremely vulnerable. Arguably the biggest threat would be if the recent sell-off in US Treasuries were to persist.

The yield differential between emerging-market debt and US Treasuries has narrowed appreciably for good reason. Whereas markets used to consider US Treasury yields as a risk-free rate against which other assets were to be judged, it is questionable just how risk-free Treasuries are given the US’s dire fiscal position.

In the event markets suffer a renewed sell-off, a larger cohort of countries will be able to withstand the pain

Then again, if necessary, the Fed has the option to embark on a new round of bond purchases, unlike its counterparts in emerging-market countries. Given the extent to which distressed bonds have already risen this year, much of this improvement in sentiment I witnessed at the IMF has arguably been priced in. It is debatable whether there is much room for spreads to tighten further. That suggests emerging-market nations will need to continue making progress getting their deficits into a sustainable position for bond prices to rally further.

Nonetheless, my trip reinforced my belief that in the event markets suffer a renewed sell-off, a larger cohort of countries will be able to withstand the pain, meaning investors suddenly have an expanded set of opportunities to choose from.

Subscribe to AIQ

Receive our insights on the big themes influencing financial markets and the global economy, from interest rates and inflation to technology and environmental change. 

Subscribe today

Key risks

Investment risk and currency risk

The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up and can fluctuate in response to changes in currency and exchange rates. Investors may not get back the original amount invested.

Related views

Important information

THIS IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but, has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. Some data shown are hypothetical or projected and may not come to pass as stated due to changes in market conditions and are not guarantees of future outcomes. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

The information contained herein is for general guidance only. It is the responsibility of any person or persons in possession of this information to inform themselves of, and to observe, all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction. The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.

In Europe, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805. Registered Office: 80 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 4AE. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act 2001 and is an Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act 2001. Registered Office: 138 Market Street, #05-01 CapitaGreen, Singapore 048946. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organisation of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom.

Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is based within the North American region of the global organisation of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. AIC is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission as a commodity trading manager, exempt market dealer, portfolio manager and investment fund manager. AIC is also registered as an exempt market dealer and portfolio manager in each province and territory of Canada and may also be registered as an investment fund manager in certain other applicable provinces.

Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.