• Emerging Market Debt
  • Fixed Income

Five years on from the taper tantrum, emerging market debt shows improved resilience

Emerging market fixed income has come a long way since the trials of 2013, says Liam Spillane.

a man kayaking

A shift in Federal Reserve policy. Rising Treasury yields. Surging market volatility. Five years ago, the US central bank indicated it would wind down its bond-buying programme, prompting the so-called ‘taper tantrum’. Emerging markets were hit particularly hard by capital outflows during the ensuing financial turbulence.

Fast forward to February 2018, and many investors experienced an uncomfortable sense of déjà vu. Signs of tightening in the US labour market led to talk the new Fed Chairman Jerome Powell would be forced to raise interest rates more quickly than expected. Global equities nosedived and bond yields rose in many markets, as in 2013.

But the response of emerging markets was much more muted this time around. Although there was a brief sell off on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, the 48 basis point rise in 10-year Treasury yields between January 1 and February 22 was comfortably absorbed into spreads on emerging market fixed income. The relative calm in emerging market debt is partly attributable to an improving macroeconomic backdrop, but it may also point to the increased resilience of the asset class itself.

Improved fundamentals

It is easy to forget how far emerging markets have come since the troubles of the 1990s. Take the Mexican debt crisis of 1994, when a Federal Reserve rate hike left the Latin American country unable to service its dollar-denominated debts. Three years later, the Asian financial crisis was sparked by the sudden devaluation of Thailand’s currency, the baht, following the government’s decision to abandon a dollar peg. The turmoil that followed exposed the instability of many of the region’s currencies and the presence of large current-account deficits in many Asian economies.

Emerging markets made great strides over the following decade, improving their fiscal positions and taking greater control over monetary policy. Such was their progress that by 2013 many investors were convinced the larger emerging economies would be relatively insulated from Fed policy decisions. The taper tantrum proved them wrong: emerging market fixed income saw significant outflows in 2013, while hard-currency EM sovereign debt returned -5.25 per cent over the year.1

But emerging markets have continued to grow deeper and more liquid since the trials of 2013. Fundamentals are strengthening, with debt-to-GDP levels relatively low and aggregate GDP growth outpacing that of developed markets (see charts). A divergence between emerging and developed market GDP tends to be accompanied by stronger portfolio flows and higher foreign direct investment, which should be supportive of further growth.

Emerging markets: current account balance (% of GDP)
line graph of current account balance as a % of GDP
Developed market vs emerging market GDP growth (%)
graph showing developed market vs emerging market growth %

Maturing markets

This is not to say that emerging markets are now completely insulated from policy shifts in developed economies. Part of the reason for the robust performance of EM debt in early 2018 is the synchronised global growth outlook (by contrast, the recovery was still relatively weak in 2013). It remains to be seen how EM debt markets would react to a steeper and more sudden rise in Treasury yields. And there is also the risk that a sudden reversal of flows from EM-focused exchange traded funds (ETFs) – which have proliferated since the taper tantrum – could stoke higher volatility.

But there is little doubt that emerging market debt is now much more resilient. EM currencies are no longer overvalued, as they were five years ago.  And increased issuance of local-currency bonds in recent years is another positive sign.

As governments issue more debt in local currency the domestic buyer base grows broader, ensuring these markets are less vulnerable to the vagaries of global capital flows. Fixed income markets in Colombia, Peru and Chile, for example, are being buttressed by strong demand from local pension funds that must hold domestic debt for regulatory reasons. Local investors are also boosting liquidity in Russia, the Middle East and East Asia.

If sovereign issuers are in better health than in 2013, the same is true of companies. Default rates on emerging market credit dropped to a record low of below two per cent in 2017, and that figure expected to be only marginally higher this year. Strong balance sheets – as evidenced by low leverage levels and high cash balances – have meant that investors’ fears about issuers’ foreign currency mismatches have not been realised.

Investment outlook

So what kinds of strategies would suit this improving outlook for EM debt? After a strong year for total returns in 2017, directional strategies are no longer likely to prove so lucrative and we expect correlations will begin to break down across both government and corporate bond markets this year.

While EM debt looks less vulnerable to a normalisation of Fed policy, investors will need to keep an eye on other macroeconomic and political risks. A slowdown in the Chinese economy – which is a possibility, given Beijing’s continued struggles to tame rampant public debt – could have a knock-on impact across other emerging economies. Investors should also monitor political risk. Twenty-seven emerging or frontier economies are due to go to the polls in 2018, and populist candidates could prevail in in Brazil and Mexico, two of the largest and most important emerging markets.

Elsewhere, however, the political situation is improving. South Africa’s prospects look much brighter under the new president Cyril Ramaphosa, who has vowed to tackle corruption. And in India, Narendra Modi’s reform programme is proceeding apace. With scope for further fiscal and economic reforms, both countries may represent opportunities in local currency debt.

In hard currency, we recommend looking beyond the obvious names. Frontier markets with capable administrations, especially those that have won the support of the IMF for reform programmes, may represent value for investors in government bonds. Central America (El Salvador), the Caribbean (Jamaica), and sub-Saharan Africa (Angola and Ghana) look particularly attractive, although local knowledge and expertise will be required to take advantage of opportunities in these markets.


1 According to the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Index.

2 For a discussion of this trend see ‘Emerging markets have become more resilient,’ The Economist, October 2017

Related views

Important information


Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. Some data shown are hypothetical or projected and may not come to pass as stated due to changes in market conditions and are not guarantees of future outcomes. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

The information contained herein is for general guidance only. It is the responsibility of any person or persons in possession of this information to inform themselves of, and to observe, all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction. The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.

In Europe, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK, this document is by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805. Registered Office: 80 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 4AE. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 138 Market Street, #05-01 CapitaGreen, Singapore 048946.

In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business address: Level 27, 101 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom.

Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is based within the North American region of the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. AIC is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission as a commodity trading manager, exempt market dealer, portfolio manager and investment fund manager. AIC is also registered as an exempt market dealer and portfolio manager in each province of Canada and may also be registered as an investment fund manager in certain other applicable provinces.

Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.