The Disaster Risk Expert: Robert Glasser

Dr Robert Glasser was formerly the United Nations Secretary General’s special representative for disaster risk reduction and head of the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. He is currently a visiting fellow at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. He explains how the rising number and intensity of natural hazards is creating an “era of disasters” and discusses mitigation and adaptation strategies.

4 minute read

Robert Glasser

Can you tell us more about the rise of disaster risk globally?

Two main factors are increasing disaster risk. The first is that many investments in infrastructure are being made without sufficiently incorporating risk. With such poorly risk-informed investments, it is not surprising more infrastructure is being destroyed and the financial costs of disaster risk are going up.

The second is climate change, whose impacts are only just becoming visible. Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of many hazards. Infrastructure investments need to take account not only of the historical risk of hazards, but also of how climate change is altering the risks. In the US, if you look at Hurricane Harvey , something like half of the homes destroyed by that were situated outside the one-in-500-year threat area.

The patterns of hazards are also changing. In Australia, in a warming world, recent scientific research suggests cyclones will begin tracking further south to parts of the country including the Gold Coast, a big tourist area with high-rise buildings that have not been designed for extreme cyclones.

How are governments responding to the potential knock-on effects?

In Australia, we are beginning to think about simultaneous and consecutive disasters, partly because we are seeing it happen before our eyes. In Queensland, our most hazard-prone state, over half the local communities over the past three years have had three or more disasters. For them, the cascading impacts are already huge; they partly recover from one and are hit by another.

The countries hit by disasters more often are the furthest along in risk and disaster planning

Generally, it is still difficult for countries to come to terms with this. As usual, the countries hit by disasters more often are the furthest along in risk and disaster planning. For example, in Bangladesh, where they can see the changing impacts of climate through the annual monsoonal flooding, they are fundamentally incorporating flood risk protection in their investments and economic planning.

For countries not yet seeing these things, it is hard enough to get them to prepare for historical hazards like the historical chance of flooding, let alone for the fact history is no longer reliable because the frequency and severity is increasing non-linearly and very quickly.

Has a lack of preparedness worsened the impact of COVID-19?

We have seen in this pandemic that governments are not very good at responding to threats when they don’t seem imminent. We had so much warning, with repeated calls about bird-flu, swine flu, SARS, MERS: there were plenty of false alarms. Governments did spend more money when each of those viruses struck, but very quickly the funding went away, rather than devoting consistent, significant funding to address this scale of threat.

On the other hand, once it was imminent, countries did respond remarkably and in unprecedented ways, as has been seen with the lockdowns, bailouts and all the rest.

What should we do to adapt our communities and businesses to the era of disasters?

First, we need to understand the risks, and there are two dimensions to this. One is what we know historically about those disasters, then adding the climate piece as we cannot rely on the past anymore. That is really tricky because you can get some useful information from climate scientists on, for instance, the risk of extreme weather in a particular part of the country, but we would need much better information to provide climate risk information at levels and with degrees of certainty that are useful for planning in regional and local communities.

The second step is to incorporate this understanding of the risk within our investments. That is important for new investments, but we also need to think about the infrastructure already in place that is not resilient. There are steps you can take, even though addressing it in existing infrastructure is much more difficult.

It is interesting to realise that where we sit defines how we look at resilience

There is another element, which is dependent on your level of analysis. Governments can think about risk in terms of economic assets and lost life, while local communities might point to a large company providing jobs and income as the source of resilience, and some remote areas may be dependent on the expertise of a single person. It may be a small point, but it is interesting to realise that where we sit defines how we look at resilience.

How is the compounding of natural hazards affecting the probability of large-scale catastrophes?

Take the food security crisis in 2010-2011. Droughts and fires in Russia, Ukraine and parts of China, as well as floods in Canada and Australia, combined to destroy the wheat crop. That led to countries hoarding wheat and hiking the price of food, which resulted in food riots in North Africa. That was a contributory factor behind the Arab Spring.

In a similar example of a negative feedback loop, at 1.5 degrees of warming most coral reefs – which are fish nurseries for perhaps ten per cent of the world’s species – will have died, depleting tropical food supplies. Scientists have also determined that fish species are already moving towards the poles to escape warming waters. At two degrees Celsius of warming, this will result in a decrease of up to 60 per cent in fisheries’ yields in the tropics. And, as coral reefs disappear, so will the protection they offer coastal areas against storm surges, exposing millions of people to more extreme weather. Combine these with the impact warming will have on agriculture, and the food security risks become enormous.

If you put all those things together, it is extremely likely we will see these cascading impacts happening relatively quickly. They will happen in a given year, but also in consecutive years, and the individual events will, in effect, become one big event as the interval of time between them shortens.

Will companies and governments adapt in time?

The business community, and the financial sector particularly, is moving faster than governments on climate risk. I suspect, as these disasters happen more often and the impacts become bigger, regulators will begin requiring corporations to disclose their exposure to climate risks and how they are addressing the risks. Ultimately, this will accelerate the movement of hundreds of billions of dollars towards more resilient infrastructure. It will change the whole system because asset owners will want to make sure they have something to offer investors that is resilient to climate and disaster risk.

It is going to become politically compelling to act because the number of these disasters is increasing so quickly

The politics on climate change are also going to change. It is going to become politically compelling to act because the number of these disasters is increasing so quickly. With the unprecedented bushfires in Australia that are clearly linked to climate change, even the government, which is a strong supporter of fossil fuels, is changing its response. If something similar happens again in the next two years, the momentum will keep building towards more ambitious action.

Would you like to read the whole of AIQ: The Risk Edition?

Subscribe to download a PDF copy or get a printed edition delivered directly to you.

Subscribe today

Important information

Except where stated as otherwise, the source of all information is Aviva Investors Global Services Limited (AIGSL). Unless stated otherwise any views and opinions are those of Aviva Investors. They should not be viewed as indicating any guarantee of return from an investment managed by Aviva Investors nor as advice of any nature. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but has not been independently verified by Aviva Investors and is not guaranteed to be accurate. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income from it may go down as well as up and the investor may not get back the original amount invested. Nothing in this material, including any references to specific securities, assets classes and financial markets is intended to or should be construed as advice or recommendations of any nature. This material is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment.

In Europe this document is issued by Aviva Investors Luxembourg S.A. Registered Office: 2 rue du Fort Bourbon, 1st Floor, 1249 Luxembourg. Supervised by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. An Aviva company. In the UK Issued by Aviva Investors Global Services Limited. Registered in England No. 1151805. Registered Office: St Helens, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm Reference No. 119178. In France, Aviva Investors France is a portfolio management company approved by the French Authority “Autorité des Marchés Financiers”, under n° GP 97-114, a limited liability company with Board of Directors and Supervisory Board, having a share capital of 17 793 700 euros, whose registered office is located at 14 rue Roquépine, 75008 Paris and registered in the Paris Company Register under n° 335 133 229. In Switzerland, this document is issued by Aviva Investors Schweiz GmbH.

In Singapore, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Asia Pte. Limited (AIAPL) for distribution to institutional investors only. Please note that AIAPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIAPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIAPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore with registration number 200813519W, holds a valid Capital Markets Services Licence to carry out fund management activities issued under the Securities and Futures Act (Singapore Statute Cap. 289) and Asian Exempt Financial Adviser for the purposes of the Financial Advisers Act (Singapore Statute Cap.110). Registered Office: 1Raffles Quay, #27-13 South Tower, Singapore 048583. In Australia, this material is being circulated by way of an arrangement with Aviva Investors Pacific Pty Ltd (AIPPL) for distribution to wholesale investors only. Please note that AIPPL does not provide any independent research or analysis in the substance or preparation of this material. Recipients of this material are to contact AIPPL in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material. AIPPL, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia with Australian Business No. 87 153 200 278 and Australian Company No. 153 200 278, holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 411458) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Business Address: Level 30, Collins Place, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.

The name “Aviva Investors” as used in this material refers to the global organization of affiliated asset management businesses operating under the Aviva Investors name. Each Aviva investors’ affiliate is a subsidiary of Aviva plc, a publicly- traded multi-national financial services company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Aviva Investors Canada, Inc. (“AIC”) is located in Toronto and is registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) as a Portfolio Manager, an Exempt Market Dealer, and a Commodity Trading Manager. Aviva Investors Americas LLC is a federally registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Aviva Investors Americas is also a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). AIA’s Form ADV Part 2A, which provides background information about the firm and its business practices, is available upon written request to: Compliance Department, 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2250, Chicago, IL 60606.

Related views